Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems 2011
DOI: 10.1145/1978942.1979382
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brick by brick

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
5
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
3
2
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
1
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our work replicates results from Rader et al (2011) by showing that biculturals switch their interpretive frames and related cognitive processing as a function of culturally congruent accent. The results here are also consistent with the work of Nass and colleagues and show that accent can be a strong cue in how users treat computers as social actors (Dahlbäck et al 2007;Nass and Brave 2007;Reeves and Nass 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our work replicates results from Rader et al (2011) by showing that biculturals switch their interpretive frames and related cognitive processing as a function of culturally congruent accent. The results here are also consistent with the work of Nass and colleagues and show that accent can be a strong cue in how users treat computers as social actors (Dahlbäck et al 2007;Nass and Brave 2007;Reeves and Nass 1996).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Nass and colleagues have demonstrated that people communicate with computers as social actors, even when there is no visual representation of a graphically rendered virtual character (Nass and Brave 2007;Nass and Yen 2010;Reeves and Nass 1996). In cases where there is a graphical representation of an animated virtual character, Blascovich defines communicative realism as a character's fidelity to human-like movements, anthropometrics, and photographic realism (Blascovich and McCall 2013;Blascovich 2002Blascovich , 2013.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further, the number of papers that matched race keywords a priori was nearly the same number of papers that were coded for focus on race a posteriori. Focus on race was comprised of one or more of the following: 1) selecting participants from specific sets of racial or ethnic groups [15,75,104], 2) developing or evaluating HCI interventions aimed at helping individuals from a particular racial or ethnic group [46,76,89], or 3) detailing the ways race or ethnicity impact technology use, appropriation, or creation [8,50,102].…”
Section: Racementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nearly a quarter of the manuscripts in the corpus matched to a keyword in the class umbrella category a priori, with an even larger number of publications including a focus on class a posteriori. Focus on class included one or more of the following: 1) recruiting participants from distinct socioeconomic classes [60,65,79], 2) investigating HCI interventions for communities of a specific socio-economic class [76,86,100], 3) reporting the ways certain class groups operate differentially from one another [25,64,90]. to better understand what designs would most help their participant population [26,60,90,100].…”
Section: Classmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Not surprisingly, chatbots, and conversational agents more broadly, are already being employed to build better worlds, both in research and in industry. There have been a range of studies involving conversational agents presented at CHI that have artificial agents involved in nursing, educational settings, activism, and conflict resolution [58,66,68,80,81]. Much of this work is focused on the interaction interface, studying things like the impacts of various avatars on embodied agents.…”
Section: Building Better Worldsmentioning
confidence: 99%