Brian Hebblethwaite's arguments against multiple incarnations

Pawl, Timothy

doi:10.1017/s0034412514000626

Cited by 6 publications

(2 citation statements)

References 15 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…20 For instance, Crisp (2009) addresses such topics as the election of Christ, whether an account of the logos asarkos can be had and whether it would be possible for the second person of the Trinity to become incarnate multiple times. This latter question has also been pursued by Brian Hebblethwaite (2001,2008)-answering in the negative-as well as, notably, Kevern (2002), Crisp (2009), LePoidevin (2009a, 2009b), and Pawl (2016b, 2016c. Crisp has also weighed in on how to conceive of Christ's relation to sin, especially whether Christ had a fallen human nature (Crisp, 2007) and whether Christ was sinless or impeccable (Crisp, 2009).…”

Section: Other Christological Locimentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent developments in analytic Christology

Arcadi

2018

Philosophy Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The notion that Jesus Christ is one person with two natures has been the venue of much philosophical theological work in the past 40 years. One mode of engagement with this idea has been to defend the coherence of the idea. This has been done by, for example, revising standard conceptions of divinity and humanity or predicate attribution. Another mode of engagement with the doctrine is to offer models for how the state of affairs of the Incarnation might work. This could involve retrieving models from thinkers of the past. Finally, the constructive mode applies the reasoning of the two natures/one person conception to other areas of Christian theology such as the atonement or the Eucharist. Examples of each of these modes from the contemporary analytic literature are presented.

show abstract

Section: Other Christological Locimentioning

confidence: 99%

Recent developments in analytic Christology

Arcadi

2018

Philosophy Compass

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…For discussion of multiple incarnations and references to other literature on the topic, seePawl (2016a;2016c; 2019b, chaps. 2 & 3).…”

mentioning

confidence: 99%

Conciliar Trinitarianism, Divine Identity Claims, and Subordination

Pawl¹

2020

TheoLogica

Self Cite

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In this article, I present the trinitarian teaching of the first seven ecumenical councils, what we might call Conciliar Trinitarianism. I then consider two questions. First, what is the relationship between the divine persons and the divine nature? I argue that neither strict identity nor instantiation interpretations of that relationship fit well with the conciliar texts. Second, does the relation of procession among the divine persons, asserted in the conciliar texts, imply an objectionable ontological subordination in the Trinity? I argue that there is at least one way for a proponent of Conciliar Trinitarianism to deny that objectionable ontological subordination follows from the divine processions.

show abstract

Bibliography

2023

Astrobiology and Christian Doctrine

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Brian Hebblethwaite's arguments against multiple incarnations

Cited by 6 publications

References 15 publications

Recent developments in analytic Christology

Recent developments in analytic Christology

Conciliar Trinitarianism, Divine Identity Claims, and Subordination

Bibliography

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About