2018
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3287552
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brevity Is the Soul of Twitter: The Constraint Affordance and Political Discussion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
8
1
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(32 citation statements)
references
References 85 publications
0
32
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For instance, Twitter recently changed its platform to allow users to post longer messages (from 140 to 280 characters). An initial analysis suggests that this subtle change in the design actually influenced people’s tendency to post content that was relatively more analytical and also more polite (Jaidka, Zhou, & Lelkes, 2019). In this way, the subtle design features of each platform will elicit different patterns of expression and behavior.…”
Section: The Design Of Social Media Facilitates the Spread Of Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For instance, Twitter recently changed its platform to allow users to post longer messages (from 140 to 280 characters). An initial analysis suggests that this subtle change in the design actually influenced people’s tendency to post content that was relatively more analytical and also more polite (Jaidka, Zhou, & Lelkes, 2019). In this way, the subtle design features of each platform will elicit different patterns of expression and behavior.…”
Section: The Design Of Social Media Facilitates the Spread Of Emotionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Notably, Jaidka et al (2019) show that interactions with U.S. political figures on Twitter became more civil and polite and more likely to include constructive information-sharing after Twitter expanded its character limit for tweets. The self-segregation inherent in the partisan streams we study 4 implies a context of increased partisan homogeneity relative to the free-for-all of Twitter, however.…”
Section: Figure 1 Screenshot Of Debate Streamed On Abc News Facebookmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It may imply impacting the members in discursive interaction -their opinions, thoughts, assessments thus finally coming to a particular decision. The powerful influence of discursive fields on the organization of content consumption can serve as a solid manipulative base -political, ideological, psychological, cognitive attitudes are introduced into mass consciousness through the formation and functioning of a certain discursive field [5][6][7][8]. The «forceful nature» of online discursive fields is ensured by their functioning in the so-called «filter bubble» and by complex linguo-cognitive structures generated by the discursive field -innovative linguistic patterns.…”
Section: Problem Statement and Theoretical Approachesmentioning
confidence: 99%