Breeding mute swan habitat selection when accounting for detectability: a plastic behaviour consistent with rapidly expanding populations

Abstract

International audienceA number of native and exotic animal species show dramatic population increases in terms of both numbers and geographic range. Understanding the habitat selection processes behind such increases is crucial to implement adequate management measures. Mute swan (Cygnus olor) populations have experienced a tremendous demographic and geographic expansion in Western Europe during the twentieth century, colonizing a wide variety of aquatic habitats. We aimed at assessing how swans select nesting sites during the pre-laying and laying periods on medium to large fishponds (from 10 to 50 ha) in Eastern France, while accounting for detectability biases and testing for the effects of fishpond spatial configuration, vegetation resources, human disturbance and habitat management. Our results demonstrate that the mute swan is a non-selective species regarding its nesting habitat among such fishponds, using these independently from the parameters considered although fishpond characteristics varied. Although mute swan is one of the least cryptic Anatidae, owing to its white colour and large size, detection of breeding pairs remained imperfect for each over several sampling occasions. However, because we repeated the sampling sessions, detection of swan pairs by the end of the monitoring period was as high as 0.94. These results are consistent with previous assertions that the mute swan is a species of high ecological plasticity, which may partly explain its recent colonization rates. Given that even swan breeding events were imperfectly detected on each occasion, we highlight Communicated by H. Kierdor

The impact of waterfowl herbivory on plant standing crop: a meta-analysis

“…populations have risen in many regions including Britain (Ward et al, 2007), Central Europe (Musil & Fuchs, 1994;Gayet et al, 2011a), Fenno-Scandinavia (Nummi & Saari, 2003) and North America (Petrie & Francis, 2003). Of the 21 goose species (Anser spp.…”

Behavioural responses of the whooper swansCygnus cygnusto human disturbance and their adaptability to the different habitats in the Rongcheng lagoon of China

“…Hence, these habitats would face some huge pressures and threats from waterfowl and the humans. On the contrary with wetland systems, the swans could be relatively tolerant to human disturbance in their selected habitats (Gayet et al, ; Tuite, Hanson, & Owen, ) and became less sensitive to disturbance events with daily disturbance frequency becoming higher or a depleted food supply occurring (Rees, Bruce, & White, ). Due to the roles of these waterfowl as an ecological environment indicator (Ogden et al, ), studying how the whooper swans adapted to their selected habitats under human disturbance was vital to habitat management.…”

The role of season and social grouping on habitat use by Mute Swans (Cygnus olor) in a lowland river catchment

“…Swans have a very high detection probability (e.g. 0.94; Gayet et al 2011c) due to their large size, conspicuous plumage and tolerance of humans. Each catchment survey took 4 days, and was only conducted during daylight hours.…”

“…To reduce subjectivity all surveys were undertaken by a single observer (KW). Such repeated monthly site visits are a well-established method of quantifying the use of a site by Mute Swans (Scott & Birkhead 1983, Scott 1984, Gayet et al 2011c, Wood et al 2012b. Swans have a very high detection probability (e.g.…”