Plant Breeding Reviews 2010
DOI: 10.1002/9780470535486.ch7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeding American Chestnuts for Blight Resistance

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 101 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Using our conceptual framework as a guide, we synthesize C. dentata biology, genetics, and ecology to serve as a foundation for identifying reintroduction goals and strategies for implementation. Recent reviews have detailed the C. dentata inter-species backcross breeding program as well as social and management considerations toward C. dentata restoration (Steiner & Carlson, 2006;Jacobs, 2007) and genetic implications of the backcross breeding program for restoration (Worthen et al, 2010). Others have highlighted the potential for the use of GE technologies in reintroduction programs (Merkle et al, 2007), a call for a broader use of species introductions as a tool for restoration (Seddon, 2010), and the need for a stronger connection between socioeconomic research and restoration practice (Collier, 2011).…”
Section: Objectives Of This Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Using our conceptual framework as a guide, we synthesize C. dentata biology, genetics, and ecology to serve as a foundation for identifying reintroduction goals and strategies for implementation. Recent reviews have detailed the C. dentata inter-species backcross breeding program as well as social and management considerations toward C. dentata restoration (Steiner & Carlson, 2006;Jacobs, 2007) and genetic implications of the backcross breeding program for restoration (Worthen et al, 2010). Others have highlighted the potential for the use of GE technologies in reintroduction programs (Merkle et al, 2007), a call for a broader use of species introductions as a tool for restoration (Seddon, 2010), and the need for a stronger connection between socioeconomic research and restoration practice (Collier, 2011).…”
Section: Objectives Of This Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the native range of C. dentata spans five US climatic zones (Fig. 1), reintroduction must also be locally adapted in order to promote successful establishment (Worthen et al, 2010). Kubisiak & Roberds (2006) found low but positive correlations between genetic and geographic distances, suggesting that C. dentata was a single metapopulation established by high gene flow and genetic drift.…”
Section: Potential Ecological Barriersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This technique is considered to be an effective method for the short-term conservation of genetic material, and as a necessary step for the application of medium and long-term conservation techniques (cryopreservation). Other recent reviews on this genus that have sought disease-resistant examples have dealt with silvics [23], the biological control with mycoviruses [24], integrating technological, ecological, and social factors in restoration [25], plant propagation [5,26], genetic modification, and breeding [4,14,27].…”
Section: Biotechnological Approaches Used For the Conservation Of Plamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scatter‐hoarding in the eastern North American deciduous forest is primarily practiced by two species of tree squirrels, the eastern gray squirrel ( Sciurus carolinensis ) and the fox squirrel ( Sciurus niger ), as well as the blue jay ( Cyanocitta cristata ) (Blythe, Lichti, Smyser, & Swihart, ; Moore, McEuen, Swihart, Contreras, & Steele, ; Richardson et al., ; Smith and Stapanian ; Steele, Smallwood, Spunar, & Nelsen, ). Although third‐generation backcross (BC3) chestnuts used for species restoration will inherit only a small fraction of the Cm genome, this genetic material may influence ecologically important traits (Worthen, Woeste, & Michler, ); for example, BC3 seeds were dispersed farther on average than seeds of Cd (Blythe et al., ). Hybrid background may affect this crucial, coevolved ecological relationship in other ways as well.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…generation backcross (BC3) chestnuts used for species restoration will inherit only a small fraction of the Cm genome, this genetic material may influence ecologically important traits (Worthen, Woeste, & Michler, 2010); for example, BC3 seeds were dispersed farther on average than seeds of Cd (Blythe et al, 2015). Hybrid background may affect this crucial, coevolved ecological relationship in other ways as well.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%