Breeding a series of new rice restorer lines with blast resistance and low‐to‐intermediate apparent amylose contents by integrating marker‐assisted and phenotypic selection

Abstract

Hybrid rice, as one of the most successful crops exploiting heterosis, has greatly contributed to global food security. Due to its high‐yield potential, approximately half of the rice‐growing area in China is planted with hybrid rice varieties. However, the extreme vulnerability of hybrid rice to various diseases and poor grain quality pose great challenges to rice breeders. Here, we report the development of five new restorer lines pyramiding the broad‐spectrum blast resistance gene Pigm and low/intermediate amylose content‐associated gene Wxb by marker‐assisted and phenotypic selection. All these new restorer lines showed enhanced blast resistance in the disease nursery compared with the original restorer lines and had low‐to‐intermediate apparent amylose contents, ranging from 11.3% to 14.2%. Genetic background analysis based on next‐generation sequencing indicated that the proportion of Gumei 4 (donor of Pigm) genome in the five new restorer lines ranged from 9.89% to 21.69%. Eight of their derived hybrid combinations, which exhibited better grain quality and higher levels of blast resistance, have been certificated for commercial release in different ecological regions of China. Among them, Jing‐Liang‐You 3189, Yue‐Liang‐You 3189, Jing‐Liang‐You 1074 and Long‐Liang‐You 3188 meet the national standards for superior‐quality rice in China. These results confirmed the success of developing elite restorer lines through marker‐assisted and phenotypic selection, and these new restorer lines have great potential in developing more elite hybrid rice combinations.

Development of Multi-Resistant Rice Restorer Lines and Hybrid Varieties by Pyramiding Resistance Genes against Blast and Brown Planthopper

“…The resistance level of a seedling was determined by the resistance score (RS = 0, 1, 3, 5, 7, or 9), and the resistance level of a line was determined by the average RS of 16 seedlings. Rice blast resistance was evaluated following the method described by Qin et al [24]. For leaf blast resistance, a scoring system ranging from 0 to 9 was utilized.…”

“…The resulting F1 plants were self-crossed to obtain the F2 segregating population. We genotyped the F2 population for Pigm, Bph6 and Bph9 using the functional marker GM [24] and the newly developed markers in this study. Additionally, we conducted phenotypic evaluations of agronomic traits to further screen the population.…”

“…This gene cluster has been extensively utilized in Chinese rice production [23]. In our previous research, we developed functional markers for the Pigm gene and selected a series of rice blast resistant varieties [24]. The objective of this study is to develop Bph6 and Bph9 functional molecular markers (FMMs) and an efficient detection system for breeding practice.…”

The Development of Multi-Resistant Rice Restorer Lines and Hybrid Varieties by Pyramiding Resistance Genes against Blast and Brown Planthopper

“…The site offers environmental conditions conducive to rice blast outbreaks, including optimal temperatures, elevated humidity, and limited sunlight. Rice blast resistance was evaluated following the method described by Qin et al [25]. For leaf blast resistance, a scoring system ranging from 0 to 9 was utilized.…”

“…This gene cluster has been extensively utilized in Chinese rice production [24]. In our previous research, we developed functional markers for the Pigm gene and selected a series of rice blast-resistant varieties [25]. The objective of this study is to develop Bph6 and Bph9 functional molecular markers (FMMs) and an efficient detection system for breeding practice.…”