2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.plantsci.2019.110396
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breeder friendly phenotyping

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
119
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 169 publications
(133 citation statements)
references
References 184 publications
0
119
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Simko and Pechenick (2010) proposed to use rank aggregation methods to combine heterogenous data from independent plant breeding trials. Simko and Linacre (2010) demonstrated how the Rasch model (Rasch 1960) can be used to combine heterogeneous data. The Rasch model is, in principle, very similar to the Luce model (Rasch 1960;Luce 1959).…”
Section: Rank Aggregation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Simko and Pechenick (2010) proposed to use rank aggregation methods to combine heterogenous data from independent plant breeding trials. Simko and Linacre (2010) demonstrated how the Rasch model (Rasch 1960) can be used to combine heterogeneous data. The Rasch model is, in principle, very similar to the Luce model (Rasch 1960;Luce 1959).…”
Section: Rank Aggregation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Simko and Linacre (2010) demonstrated how the Rasch model (Rasch 1960) can be used to combine heterogeneous data. The Rasch model is, in principle, very similar to the Luce model (Rasch 1960;Luce 1959). Simko and Linacre (2010) presented four different real datasets as case examples; for brevity, we only focus on one of the datasets, containing data of potato chip quality evaluations.…”
Section: Rank Aggregation Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In this section, we will elaborate and discuss important traits that confer adaptation and tolerance to chickpea in response to abiotic stresses with emphasis on heat, cold and drought [132]. To avoid skepticism and reluctance to adopt HTP methods due to their complexity, cost and sometimes unproven reliability, we only recommend 'breeder friendly' HTP approaches that can quantitatively measure these traits on a large number of genetic resources or progeny experimental units [133], which are detailed in Table 4.…”
Section: Common Adaptive Traits and High Throughput Phenotyping Appromentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Recent developments in high-throughput phenotyping have already made significant contributions to physiological breeding 18,38,39 and breeding programmes 40 . Assessment of photosynthetic related traits using high-throughput surrogates based on spectral profiles has allowed the identification of genetic variation in wheat for photosynthetic capacity and efficiency 24 and respiration 20 at leaf level along with pigmentation composition and water content at canopy level allowing the identification of QTLs associated with spectral indices 41,42 .…”
Section: Using High Density Genotyping and High-throughput Phenotypinmentioning
confidence: 99%