The platform will undergo maintenance on Sep 14 at about 9:30 AM EST and will be unavailable for approximately 1 hour.
1957
DOI: 10.3382/ps.0361247
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breed Differences in Egg Production of Domestic Fowl Held at High Environmental Temperatures ,

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 45 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It is generally recognized that the White Leghorn breed is more tolerant of high temperature than are heavier breeds (Emmans and Charles, 1977;Huston, Joiner andCarmon, 1957 andWilson, 1949). This may be due to their combs (van Kampen, 1974), which grow larger at high temperatures (Emmans and Charles, 1977).…”
Section: Breedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…It is generally recognized that the White Leghorn breed is more tolerant of high temperature than are heavier breeds (Emmans and Charles, 1977;Huston, Joiner andCarmon, 1957 andWilson, 1949). This may be due to their combs (van Kampen, 1974), which grow larger at high temperatures (Emmans and Charles, 1977).…”
Section: Breedmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…There is an evidence that in an environment of 90°F (32.2°C) and higher, the temperature-regulating mechanism of the bird cannot adequately control body temperature within the normal range and it therefore rises (Heywang, 1938;Wilson, 1949). This rise produces a 'fever' (hyperthermia) which upsets the normal physiological processes sufficient to cause a decline or cessation of egg production (Huston et al, 1957).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…However, many investigators, including Gutteridge and O'Neil (1942), King et al (1952) Gowe and Wakely (1954), Lowry et al (1956), Abplanalp (1956), Proudfoot et al (1957), McBride (1962), Becker (1961) and Proudfoot (1962), either found no such interactions or found them to be of little importance. Significant interactions were found by Osborn (1952), Skaller and Sheldon (1955), Gowe (1956), Merritt and Gowe (1956), Hill and Nordskog (1956), Huston and Joiner (1957), Johnson and Asmundson (1957), Nordskog and Kempthorne (1958), King and Bray (1959), Dickerson (I960), Abplanalp and Menzi (1961) and Abplanalp el al. (1962).…”
Section: Introduction G Enotype By Environment Interac-mentioning
confidence: 80%