2005
DOI: 10.1016/j.radonc.2005.07.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breathing adapted radiotherapy for breast cancer: Comparison of free breathing gating with the breath-hold technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

7
180
0
3

Year Published

2012
2012
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 233 publications
(190 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
7
180
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The typical maximum uncertainties/setup errors involved in left breast and chest wall treatment in the A/P direction (vertical chest wall excursion over the treatment duration) have been reported to be as large as 5 mm 13 , 14 , 15 . Patient‐induced chest wall shifts of a similar magnitude during DIBH have also been reported 7 , 8 …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The typical maximum uncertainties/setup errors involved in left breast and chest wall treatment in the A/P direction (vertical chest wall excursion over the treatment duration) have been reported to be as large as 5 mm 13 , 14 , 15 . Patient‐induced chest wall shifts of a similar magnitude during DIBH have also been reported 7 , 8 …”
Section: Introductionsupporting
confidence: 54%
“…Existing studies suggest that setup errors in the A/P direction can range from approximately 2 to 5 mm 14 , 15 . Additional studies have shown that patients may shift their chest wall position during free breathing (FB), BH, and DIBH by 2.5 2.7 and 4.6 mm, respectively 7 , 8 , 14 , 15 . Similarly, uncertainty in the superior/inferior (S/I) direction may also be significant during DIBH delivery, where patient‐induced shifts may be as large as 6.6 mm (7) .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Deep inspiration breath‐hold (DIBH) during radiotherapy is a well‐established technique for treating left‐sided breast cancer (LSBC), and provides a reliable solution to lessen cardiopulmonary doses in breast irradiation 1, 2. It is also assumed that the long‐term risk of developing cardiac damage is reduced 3, 4…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%