2021
DOI: 10.1002/mp.15006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast ultrasound image segmentation: A coarse‐to‐fine fusion convolutional neural network

Abstract: Purpose Breast ultrasound (BUS) image segmentation plays a crucial role in computer‐aided diagnosis systems for BUS examination, which are useful for improved accuracy of breast cancer diagnosis. However, such performance remains a challenging task owing to the poor image quality and large variations in the sizes, shapes, and locations of breast lesions. In this paper, we propose a new convolutional neural network with coarse‐to‐fine feature fusion to address the aforementioned challenges. Methods The proposed… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 30 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
(75 reference statements)
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…When compared to the level set model for multiclass [31], this study optimizes Jaccard; the value is 0.9999 in malignant and 0.9954 in benign, both of which are better than 0.9658. At the same time, the runtime is shorter, 0.233 s and 0.185 s in this study, which is shorter than 2.6 s. Considering the Dice, by comparing soft and hard attention multitask learning [38] and Coarse-to-Fine Fusion CNN [37], the scores are 0.9999 and 0.9977, respectively, both of which are better than 0.8142 and 0.8652.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…When compared to the level set model for multiclass [31], this study optimizes Jaccard; the value is 0.9999 in malignant and 0.9954 in benign, both of which are better than 0.9658. At the same time, the runtime is shorter, 0.233 s and 0.185 s in this study, which is shorter than 2.6 s. Considering the Dice, by comparing soft and hard attention multitask learning [38] and Coarse-to-Fine Fusion CNN [37], the scores are 0.9999 and 0.9977, respectively, both of which are better than 0.8142 and 0.8652.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 60%
“…rough the investigation of Dice and Jaccard, Jaccard and running time were compared to level set model for multiclass [31], and Dice was compared to Coarse-to-Fine Fusion CNN [37] and soft and hard attention multitask learning [38], respectively. By testing the surface of the public data set, the value of the method explained in this paper is better than that listed in level set model for multiclass [31] on Jaccard, which reduces the running time; when compared to the Dice index, the value of the Dice method in this paper is higher than that mentioned in Coarse-to-Fine Fusion CNN [37] and soft and hard attention multitask learning [38].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…With the development and application of computer technology, researchers choose to continuously train the tumor ultrasound image dataset to learn with the help of deep learning network and independently extract the information features in the dataset, so as to realize noninvasive tumor medical auxiliary judgment [ 7 ]. However, it should also be noted that, due to the deep structure of the depth network model, the gradient is easy to disappear when training the dataset to learn, which makes it difficult for the image segmentation network model to realize accurate and effective tumor region recognition.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%