2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2004.08.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast tissue characterization using FARMA modeling of ultrasonic RF echo

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Extensive experimental data show tissue modifications due to breast, prostate, and other cancers affect ultrasonic backscatter measurements, and both empirical and analytical models have been developed to estimate tissue parameters such as cell sizes and distributions. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Empirical models statistically define spectral parameters from tissue measurements, and studies have shown excellent agreement for homogeneous tissues but discrepancies for heterogeneous tissues. 7 Analytical models average the scattering from uniformly distributed cells or cell nuclei, and employ simplifications such as single scattering, weak scattering (Born approximation), and fluidlike tissue properties (no shear waves).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Extensive experimental data show tissue modifications due to breast, prostate, and other cancers affect ultrasonic backscatter measurements, and both empirical and analytical models have been developed to estimate tissue parameters such as cell sizes and distributions. [2][3][4][5][6][7] Empirical models statistically define spectral parameters from tissue measurements, and studies have shown excellent agreement for homogeneous tissues but discrepancies for heterogeneous tissues. 7 Analytical models average the scattering from uniformly distributed cells or cell nuclei, and employ simplifications such as single scattering, weak scattering (Born approximation), and fluidlike tissue properties (no shear waves).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The large amount of negative biopsies encountered in clinical practice could be reduced if a computer system was available to help the radiologists screen breast images. Broadly, the CAD systems proposed in the literature can be grouped into four major categories: geometrical [1], artificial intelligence [2], pyramidal (or multiresolution) [3], and model-based techniques [4], [5]. Geometrical methods employ morphological and other segmentation techniques to extract small specks of calcium known as microcalcifications from breast images [1].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited by the size of the basic wavelet function, the downside of the uniform resolution is uniformly poor resolution. Model-based methods include linear, non-linear and finite-element methods to build an accurate model of the breast [4], [5]. The model is subsequently used for image matching, detection, and classification [5].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations