2008
DOI: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2007.08.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast MR segmentation and lesion detection with cellular neural networks and 3D template matching

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
1

Year Published

2011
2011
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 68 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
49
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Ertas et al developed an automatic algorithm for the detection of breast lesions based on cellular neural network segmentation and 3D template matching (14). They assessed the performance of their system on a dataset of 39 lesions, of which 19 were benign and 20 malignant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Ertas et al developed an automatic algorithm for the detection of breast lesions based on cellular neural network segmentation and 3D template matching (14). They assessed the performance of their system on a dataset of 39 lesions, of which 19 were benign and 20 malignant.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As it is not operator dependent, a fully automatic lesion segmentation process has the potential to reduce reading time and provide more reproducible results. Unfortunately, few studies have addressed automatic lesion detection and segmentation techniques for breast DCE-MRI (14)(15)(16). Furthermore, to our knowledge these methods have been tested only on non-fat-saturated (fat-sat) contrast-enhanced images.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some studies proposed automated approaches for breast segmentation. Ertas et al [7] presented a breast segmentation method using two kinds of cellular neural networks; one is for thresholding and another for removing small objects and smoothing sharp corners. In another work [8], 3D bias-corrected fuzzy c-means clustering and morphological operations were used to determine the breast region.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The number of pixels of ( ) and ( ) have to be found first, where ( ) represents the segmented region by the proposed approach, while ( ) represents the ground truth regions segmented by the experts. The evaluation measures used in this study are; True Positive Fraction (TPF) (also called Sensitivity), True Negative Fraction (TNF) [23][24][25][26], Relative Overlap (RO) (also called segmentation precision) and Misclassification Rate (MCR) which have been used before for brain segmentation [27] and in breast segmentation [8,28]. The calculations are made using the equations 5-8.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%