1992
DOI: 10.1017/s0021932000006799
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast-Feeding in London, 1905–19

Abstract: Medical Officer of Health reports for London boroughs, 1900-19, are analysed to determine the incidence of neonatal breast-feeding, duration of lactation, reasons for early supplementation and premature weaning, and their relationship with infant mortality. In a sample of 222,989 infants, breast-feeding rates were very high. Over 90% were breast-fed in the first month, almost 80% at 3 months, and over 70% at 6 months. The poorest boroughs had the highest rates of neonatal breast-feeding, but also a higher inci… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The merits of early visiting by a woman inspector or health visitor are still debated (see Reid, 2001a , 119–20 for an overview), but the notification of births and the health visiting system also allowed monitoring of the sort that enabled Howarth to perform his analysis, and many Medical Officers of Health began to publish feeding statistics in their annual reports. The analyses of such reports form the bulk of what is known about infant feeding in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries: Valerie Fildes collected statistics for 22 Local Authorities and 23 London Boroughs for the period 1900–1919, and Peter Atkins' data set includes information from 95 Local Authorities and 28 London Boroughs between 1902 and 1938 ( Fildes, 1990 , Fildes, 1992 , Fildes, 1998 , Atkins, 2003 ). These studies confirm that the majority of infants were breast-fed during their first two months and that hand-feeding was associated with a lethal penalty of high infant mortality (see also Buchanan, 1985 , 156; Dyhouse, 1978 , 255; Lewis, 1980 , 71; Marks, 1996 , 107–10).…”
Section: Infant Feeding In the Past And The Establishment Of Health Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The merits of early visiting by a woman inspector or health visitor are still debated (see Reid, 2001a , 119–20 for an overview), but the notification of births and the health visiting system also allowed monitoring of the sort that enabled Howarth to perform his analysis, and many Medical Officers of Health began to publish feeding statistics in their annual reports. The analyses of such reports form the bulk of what is known about infant feeding in the late nineteenth and early twentieth centuries: Valerie Fildes collected statistics for 22 Local Authorities and 23 London Boroughs for the period 1900–1919, and Peter Atkins' data set includes information from 95 Local Authorities and 28 London Boroughs between 1902 and 1938 ( Fildes, 1990 , Fildes, 1992 , Fildes, 1998 , Atkins, 2003 ). These studies confirm that the majority of infants were breast-fed during their first two months and that hand-feeding was associated with a lethal penalty of high infant mortality (see also Buchanan, 1985 , 156; Dyhouse, 1978 , 255; Lewis, 1980 , 71; Marks, 1996 , 107–10).…”
Section: Infant Feeding In the Past And The Establishment Of Health Vmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is also possible that sickly neonates were less likely to have been breast fed, 10 and early poor health rather than breast feeding may have affected their growth. 32 Furthermore, within-family differences in feeding patterns may reflect differences between family members in infant health.…”
Section: Limitationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the other hand, since the health and nutritional status of the mother is a n important factor in the quantity and quality of breast milk, problems might continue beyond 1 year. As Fildes (1992) has pointed out, poor, undernourished women may breast-feed their children for several years, in some cases, to avoid frequent pregnancies and because of the difficulty of obtaining artificial foods. Under these circumstances it is not unreasonable to expect growth and health problems in breast-fed infants and children for longer than the postneonatal period and such a situation might have arisen in some past populations.…”
Section: Summary Of Enamel Hypoplasia Studiesmentioning
confidence: 99%