2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2013.10.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast density classification to reduce false positives in CADe systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 32 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 50 publications
(58 reference statements)
0
22
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To automatically detect masses, the feature-fusion based approach was developed in [23] using canonical correlation analysis (CCA). In [24], a hierarchical classification procedure was developed based on the combined linear discriminant analysis (LDA). However in [25] a set of 349 ROI masses were used to characterize of breast mass by using three classifiers Bayesian, Fisher and SVM.…”
Section: Pre-and Post-processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To automatically detect masses, the feature-fusion based approach was developed in [23] using canonical correlation analysis (CCA). In [24], a hierarchical classification procedure was developed based on the combined linear discriminant analysis (LDA). However in [25] a set of 349 ROI masses were used to characterize of breast mass by using three classifiers Bayesian, Fisher and SVM.…”
Section: Pre-and Post-processing Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Feature extraction, which is the third stage, is an undoubtedly important task for pattern recognition and is implemented with a remarkable number of techniques in several studies. Specifically, there are statistical techniques [2025], model-based techniques [26, 27], graph-theoretic approaches [28], and signal processing techniques that compute breast tissue features from pixel characteristics [22, 29] or frequency spectrum [21, 23, 24, 3032] for breast cancer diagnosis on a mammographic image. Additionally, there are various studies using mammographic features [20, 3336] like shape, spicule index, contour, size, density, and brightness.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since some calcifications are very small and the density difference between the healthy tissue and masses may be very low, diagnosis process will be difficult. Therefore, considering the importance of the accurate diagnosis, Computer-Aided Diagnosis (CAD) techniques were presented in recent years [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8][9][10][11] to help physicians and also reduce False Positive Rate (FPR) to perform diagnosis action faster, more easily and more accurately.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%