2018
DOI: 10.1007/s00330-017-5287-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast-density assessment with hand-held ultrasound: A novel biomarker to assess breast cancer risk and to tailor screening?

Abstract: • The novel speed-of-sound ultrasound correlated significantly with mammographic ACR breast density categories. • Radiographers measured breast density without women discomfort or radiation. • SoS-US can be implemented on a standard US machine. • SoS-US shows potential for a quantifiable, cost-effective assessment of breast density.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 31 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For multi-parametric characterization, UA can be an imaging biomarker complementary to speed-of-sound, which may be superior to elastography [6]. The quantification of speed-of-sound was recently proposed for breast density [14] and sarcopenia assessment [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For multi-parametric characterization, UA can be an imaging biomarker complementary to speed-of-sound, which may be superior to elastography [6]. The quantification of speed-of-sound was recently proposed for breast density [14] and sarcopenia assessment [12].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The patient characteristics are listed in Tables 1 and 2. The SoS of the tumors (n = 20) of this study were compared with the SoS of breast tissue segments (retromamillary, inner, and outer) of 106 healthy women. 35 Speckles-based 2D SoS-US images as well as mammographic breast density categories (A, almost entirely fatty; B, scattered areas of fibroglandular density; C, heterogeneously dense; and D, extremely dense) according to the American College of Radiology (ACR) Breast Imaging Reporting and Data System (BIRADS) fifth edition 37 were acquired in 318 tissue segments.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…34 External reflectors in combination with hand-held US probes have been used to measure SoS (external reflector-based method). 35,36 Sanabria et al 34 have shown the potential of tissue reflections and scattering (speckles) to serve as internal reflector and timing references, which leads to even easier measurement operability for SoS imaging by hand-held probes.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A large clinical comparison study between SWS and SoS for breast lesion differentiation is yet not available. Nevertheless, it was shown in several individual studies that SoS is able to discriminate between adipose and fibrous tissues, and has been applied in several clinical contexts such as breast density classification (Sak et al 2015, Sanbria et al 2018, diagnosis of liver steatosis (Imbault et al 2017) and assessment of fatty musculoskeletal degeneration (Qu et al 2017).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%