2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2023.107373
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast cancer survival analysis agents for clinical decision support

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 30 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The choice of algorithms, such as CART, C4.5, or random forests, introduces variability in model performance and interpretability. Comparative analyses, like that conducted by [17][18][19][20], have shed light on the strengths and limitations of different decision tree algorithms in the context of breast cancer risk analysis.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The choice of algorithms, such as CART, C4.5, or random forests, introduces variability in model performance and interpretability. Comparative analyses, like that conducted by [17][18][19][20], have shed light on the strengths and limitations of different decision tree algorithms in the context of breast cancer risk analysis.…”
Section: Literature Surveymentioning
confidence: 99%