1999
DOI: 10.13181/mji.v8i2.700
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast cancer risk factors among Sundanese and other ethnic groups in Indonesia

Abstract: Penelitian cara kasus-kontrol telah dilakukan untuk analisafaktor risiko pada kanker payudara wanita Indonesia. Tiga ratus kasus dan 600 kontrol diwawancara menggunakan kuesioner baku untuk pengumpulan data epidemiologik. Subyek diteliti untuk berbagai data demografik, status reproduksi, perilaku seks, kebiasaan makan dan cara-cara hidup lain. Data dianalisa untuk menentukan faktor risiko yang bermakna menggunakan analisa univariat dan multivariat. Perhatian khusus diberikan untuk evaluasi faktor risiko berkai… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Among the case-control studies, 19 studies [12,21,24,27,30,32,33,35,37,41,43,44,46,48,54,55,62,64,65] were rated one star for the item of representativeness of the cases since they selected consecutive eligible cases in a defined area over a defined period. However, selection bias was still possible as only 12 studies recruited controls from the same community as the cases, while the remaining studies either used a hospital-based design [22][23][24]27,28,[30][31][32]35,39,[42][43][44][45]47,48,50,52,53,[55][56][57]59,60,63,65] or provided no description of the source [25,26,29,…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Among the case-control studies, 19 studies [12,21,24,27,30,32,33,35,37,41,43,44,46,48,54,55,62,64,65] were rated one star for the item of representativeness of the cases since they selected consecutive eligible cases in a defined area over a defined period. However, selection bias was still possible as only 12 studies recruited controls from the same community as the cases, while the remaining studies either used a hospital-based design [22][23][24]27,28,[30][31][32]35,39,[42][43][44][45]47,48,50,52,53,[55][56][57]59,60,63,65] or provided no description of the source [25,26,29,…”
Section: Methodological Qualitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…No eligible cohort study was included in this comparison. In the 41 case-control studies [12,14,[21][22][23][24][25][26][27]29,[31][32][33][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42][43][44][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][54][55][56][57][58][59][60][61][62][63][64], a 20% risk increase (OR = 1.20; 95% confidence interval (95% CI): 1.07 to 1.35) for breast cancer was detected in the unmarried women versus the married women, with considerable heterogeneity (I 2 = 82%; 95% CI: 77% to 87%). The meta-regression identified geographic region as a potential source of heterogeneity (P = 0.004) (S2 File).…”
Section: Effect Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, two Indonesian ethnic groups, the Minangkabau and Sundanese, which are located in the West Sumatra and West Java provinces, respectively, have different types of cuisine. Minangkabau food is dominated by coconut milk, and is processed by boiling for long periods of time, while the Sundanese cuisine has more fresh vegetables, and dishes are usually cooked by frying [29,30]. Cooking at high temperatures, with low moisture content and long periods of time, is known to increase the formation of AGEs in foods.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Moreover, the differences among ethnic groups might be caused by the differences in the dietary pattern. Compared to other ethnic groups, the Sundanese have a greater fruit and vegetable intake [21]. This dietary pattern might affect their hand dimensions, particularly on the depth dimensions of the hands such as depth at the finger joint.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%