Breast cancer research output, 1945-2008: a bibliometric and density-equalizing analysis

Glynn, Ronan W; Scutaru, Cristian; Sweeney, Karl; Kerin, Michael J.

doi:10.1016/j.ejso.2011.03.113

Cited by 15 publications

(24 citation statements)

References 14 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Although the overall productivity of research publication was highest for the United States, but per capita productivity was higher in Western European countries such of Sweden. It can be caused by economic development which had a significant impact on research productivity, with higher income nations likes the United States contributing to a majority of publications which supported by the previous studies (Glynn et al, 2010;Perez-Santos et al, 2013).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

“…They were many bibliometric researches in the field of oncology (Ugolini and Mela, 2003;Ugolini et al, 2007;Michon and Tummers, 2009;Chua et al, 2011). However, few studies have documented patterns of publications in clinical and basic science research involving breast cancer research output (Glynn et al, 2010;Perez-Santos and Anaya-Ruiz, 2013).…”

Section: Suwit Duangmanomentioning

confidence: 99%

See 1 more Smart Citation

A Bibliometric Analysis of Diets and Breast Cancer Research

Kotepui¹,

Wannaiampikul²,

Chupeerach³

et al. 2014

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 53%

Section: Suwit Duangmanomentioning

confidence: 99%

A Bibliometric Analysis of Diets and Breast Cancer Research

Kotepui¹,

Wannaiampikul²,

Chupeerach³

et al. 2014

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Particularly, there is a study related to portuguese breast cancer research (Donato and De Oliveira, 2006). As these studies, the results of this present analysis are consistent with other studies that have demonstrated an increase in breast cancer research publications worldwide (Glynn et al, 2010;Healy et al, 2011).…”

Section: Discussionsupporting

confidence: 83%

Mexican Breast Cancer Research Output, 2003-2012

Pérez-Santos

Anaya-Ruı́z²

2013

Asian Pacific Journal of Cancer Prevention

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

The objetive of this study was to explore a bibliometric approach to quantitatively assess current research trends with regard to breast cancer in Mexico. Articles were analyzed by scientific output and research performances of individuals, institutes, and collaborative countries with Mexico. Data were retrieved from the Web of Science database from 2003 to 2012; this was searched using different terms related to breast cancer, including "breast cancer", "mammary ductal carcinoma" and "breast tumour". Data were then extracted from each file, transferred to Excel charts and visualised as diagrams. A total of 256 articles were retrieved. The institutions with the majority of publications were the National Autonomous University of Mexico (22.3%), the National Institute of Cancerology (21.9%), and Social Security Mexican Institute (20.3%); clinical observation studies were the dominant investigation type (64%), and the main types of research were metabolics (24.2%) and pathology (21.5%). This article demonstrates the usefulness of bibliometrics to address key evaluation questions and to establish priorities, define future areas of research, and develop breast cancer control strategies in Mexico.

show abstract

“…Nevertheless, this study is not the first to show the dominance of these countries in producing and publishing scientific profiles, other studies have also confirmed the productivity of these countries [16][17][18].…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 92%

Scientific Profiles in the Field of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting

Biglu¹,

Farnam²,

Abotalebi³

2017

J Health Med Inform

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Results: Analysis of data showed that, although the number of papers in the field of female genital mutilation/cutting was not remarkable, but it steady increased through the period of study, so that the number of papers in 2015 was two times greater than those in 2006. English consisting 94% of total publication was the language of publications. The vast majority of publication type was in the form of journal articles (65%). Based on the Bradford Scatterings law the journal of "International of Gynecology Obstetrics" was the most productive journal. USA, England and Australia were the most productive countries in the field. Conclusion:The study concluded that the research activities in the field of FGM/C regarding to the number of circumcised women in the world was very small and insufficient. The psychological aspects of FGM/C have been neglected by the scientists as well as the women health organizations.

show abstract

Breast cancer research output, 1945-2008: a bibliometric and density-equalizing analysis

Cited by 15 publications

References 14 publications

A Bibliometric Analysis of Diets and Breast Cancer Research

A Bibliometric Analysis of Diets and Breast Cancer Research

Mexican Breast Cancer Research Output, 2003-2012

Scientific Profiles in the Field of Female Genital Mutilation/Cutting

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About