2020
DOI: 10.17577/ijertv9is020280
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast Cancer Classification and Prediction using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
2
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In CNN, the image had a 62% correct classification rate and a 36% incorrect classification rate. The classification rate in DenseNet [31] is75% for correctly classified items and 20.85% for incorrectly classified items. The efficacy of the suggested method can be compared to several cutting-edge approaches that are employed for the classification of BC on histopathology images.…”
Section: Idc Dataset Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In CNN, the image had a 62% correct classification rate and a 36% incorrect classification rate. The classification rate in DenseNet [31] is75% for correctly classified items and 20.85% for incorrectly classified items. The efficacy of the suggested method can be compared to several cutting-edge approaches that are employed for the classification of BC on histopathology images.…”
Section: Idc Dataset Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14) Nikitha Rane, Jean Sunny presented work on the classification of Cancer using machine learning concepts and their major discussion point is detecting cancer in very early stages so that a lot of lives can be saved [14].…”
Section: IImentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The importance of the tree correlation is increased by the random forest's superior accuracy performance [30]. The risk of overfitting is decreased, and the error and converge into some value is generalized, by building a lot of trees into a random forest [20,31].…”
Section: πΊπ‘Žπ‘–π‘›(𝑑 π‘₯) = 𝐸(𝑑) βˆ’ 𝐸(𝑑 π‘₯)mentioning
confidence: 99%