1995
DOI: 10.1006/pmed.1995.1022
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breast Cancer and NSAID Use: Heterogeneity of Effect in a Case-Control Study

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
26
1
1

Year Published

2000
2000
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
3
26
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Within case-control studies, the reduction in risk was smaller in studies with cancer controls than in those with non-cancer controls. Although this finding is consistent with studies on NSAID use and colon cancer (Harris et al, 1995), it may argue against a true effect against breast cancer since this should be consistent across control groups. It is possible that some cancer subtypes (for example, gastrointestinal) were related to NSAID use and these patients discontinued the drug.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Within case-control studies, the reduction in risk was smaller in studies with cancer controls than in those with non-cancer controls. Although this finding is consistent with studies on NSAID use and colon cancer (Harris et al, 1995), it may argue against a true effect against breast cancer since this should be consistent across control groups. It is possible that some cancer subtypes (for example, gastrointestinal) were related to NSAID use and these patients discontinued the drug.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 86%
“…These drugs are often taken sporadically in a pattern of intake that may be difficult to remember or summarize for some subjects. For example, some widely used brands or combination product may not be recognized as containing aspirin (Harris et al, 1995). It is possible that NSAID use may reflect a health consciousness among the control group.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…'Large' indicates tumour size > 5 cm diameter or tumour with direct extension to the chest wall or skin, including inflammatory carcinoma. The ORs and their 95% Cls in the two columns on the right side of the table were derived from the analyses shown in The magnitude of the protective effect on risk that we observed at the highest level of exposure (Table 1, RR = 0.76, 95% CI 0.63-0.92) was comparable to that observed by others (Gridley et al, 1993;Schreinemachers and Everson, 1994;Friedman and Ury, 1980;Harris et al, 1995Harris et al, , 1996. However, some did not find similar effects.…”
Section: Interpretation Of Resultssupporting
confidence: 61%
“…The epidemiologic evidence for similar effects in women is limited and inconsistent (Isomäki et al, 1978;Friedman and Ury, 1980;Gridley et al, 1993;Thun et al, 1993;Schreinemachers and Everson, 1994;Harris et al, 1995Harris et al, , 1996Egan et al, 1996).To study the effects of NSAID use on breast cancer risk we carried out a nested case-control study, using the records of the Saskatchewan Cancer Agency (SCA) and data collected routinely by the Saskatchewan Prescription Drug Plan (SPDP), which has provided full or partial outpatient drug coverage to the Saskatchewan population since 1975.To study the effects of NSAID use on breast cancer growth and spread we carried out analyses using the drug exposure histories of the cases and attributes of the stage of their tumours at diagnosis, as assessed by the international tumour-lymph node-metastasis (TNM) system (Spiessl et al, 1992). …”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation