Breaking the wave of peri‐implantitis

Fu, Jianlin; Wang, Hom‐Lay

doi:10.1111/prd.12335

Cited by 106 publications

(88 citation statements)

References 182 publications

(332 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Periodontitis and peri-implantitis are defined as polymicrobial diseases caused by multiple bacterial species (Leonhardt et al, 1999;Koyanagi et al, 2010;Abusleme et al, 2013;Koyanagi et al, 2013;Maruyama et al, 2014;Zheng et al, 2015;Yu et al, 2019). There is strong evidence suggesting that a history of periodontitis is a risk factor for peri-implantitis (Fu and Wang, 2020). In addition, peri-implantitis shows clinical symptoms similar to those of periodontitis (Lindhe et al, 1992).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Discriminating Microbial Community Structure Between Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis With Integrated Metagenomic, Metatranscriptomic, and Network Analysis

Komatsu

Shiba

Takeuchi

et al. 2020

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Peri-implantitis and periodontitis are both polymicrobial diseases induced by subgingival plaque accumulation, with some differing clinical features. Studies on the microbial and gene transcription activity of peri-implantitis microbiota are limited. This study aimed to verify the hypothesis that disease-specific microbial and gene transcription activity lead to disease-specific clinical features, using an integrated metagenomic, metatranscriptomic, and network analysis. Metagenomic data in peri-implantitis and periodontitis were obtained from the same 21 subjects and metatranscriptomic data from 12 subjects were obtained from a database. The microbial co-occurrence network based on metagenomic analysis had more diverse species taxa and correlations than the network based on the metatranscriptomic analysis. Solobacterium moorei and Prevotella denticola had high activity and were core species taxa specific to peri-implantitis in the co-occurrence network. Moreover, the activity of plasmin receptor/glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase genes was higher in peri-implantitis. These activity differences may increase complexity in the peri-implantitis microbiome and distinguish clinical symptoms of the two diseases. These findings should help in exploring a novel biomarker that assist in the diagnosis and preventive treatment design of peri-implantitis.

show abstract

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Discriminating Microbial Community Structure Between Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis With Integrated Metagenomic, Metatranscriptomic, and Network Analysis

Komatsu

Shiba

Takeuchi

et al. 2020

Front. Cell. Infect. Microbiol.

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…One of the main causes of osseointegration failure is lack of proper oral hygiene. Therefore, Patients with poor oral hygiene were excluded to avoid the risk of periimplant mucositis and peri-implantitis [12] .…”

Section: Discussionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Effect of LASER on Crestal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture

Mohamed

Kothayer

2020

OMX

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Objective: The aim of this study is to evaluate the effect of using both diode and erbium, chromium: yttrium-scandiumgallium-garnet (Er,Cr:YSGG) LASERs on crestal bone loss around dental implants retaining mandibular overdenture. Materials and Methods: Cross over study on twelve patients selected from outpatient clinic faculty of dentistry, Ain Shams University to receive mandibular implant supported overdenture with and without laser application. The prepared osteotomy were treated with Er:Cr:YSGG 2780 nm LASER, and then implant was inserted, followed by applying diode 940 nm LASER for all the right sided implants and no laser application for the left sided implants. Cone beam CT was done to investigate crestal bone changes at zero, three, six and twelve months. Results: The result of this study showed that there is a statistically significant higher crestal bone loss in group A implants (without laser application) in the first follow up period only (after three months), while after one year follow up there was non statistically significant difference between both groups. Conclusion:Based on the results of this study it can be concluded that peri-implant crestal bone loss showed non statistically significant difference between the two groups after one year follow up period although it was significantly higher in group A implants (without laser application) in the first follow up period (from 0 -3 months).

show abstract

“…While not as well studied as periodontitis, approaches used to prevent peri‐implantitis probably mirror those used to prevent destruction of the periodontal tissues that support natural teeth. Wang and colleagues provide an excellent overview on the prevention of peri‐implantitis . They conclude that, like teeth, dental implants must be cleansed daily, using toothbrushes and interdental aids, to remove biofilm.…”

Section: Prevention Of Peri‐implant Diseasesmentioning

confidence: 99%

The prevention of periodontal disease—An overview

Scannapieco

Gershovich

2020

Periodontology 2000

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

It is widely accepted that common diseases of the oral cavity, such as gingivitis and periodontitis, are preventable. Based on a large body of scientific evidence, a number of preventive strategies are known to prevent these diseases, but only if routinely implemented. Unfortunately, while most preventive strategies are theoretically simple to understand, they are often difficult to employ in practice at individual and public health levels. This volume of Periodontology 2000 provides the most current information on the state of the science and the evidence base supporting a preventive perspective for the management of periodontal disease, including evidence for proven interventions as well as cutting‐edge ideas for potential future interventions. In addition to well‐established and scientifically proven approaches (tooth and implant cleansing, topical chemotherapeutics, reduction in risk factors such as tobacco smoking), a number of new ideas are now under investigation, including antioxidant agents, probiotics, vaccines, and slow‐release alternative chemotherapeutics. Furthermore, there are new ideas to alter patient behaviors with the aim to improve adherence to preventive strategies. Finally, examples from implementation science and public health are provided that suggest novel approaches to bring new ideas into clinical practice.

show abstract

Breaking the wave of peri‐implantitis

Cited by 106 publications

References 182 publications

Discriminating Microbial Community Structure Between Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis With Integrated Metagenomic, Metatranscriptomic, and Network Analysis

Discriminating Microbial Community Structure Between Peri-Implantitis and Periodontitis With Integrated Metagenomic, Metatranscriptomic, and Network Analysis

Effect of LASER on Crestal Bone Loss Around Dental Implants Retaining Mandibular Overdenture

The prevention of periodontal disease—An overview

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About