2018
DOI: 10.1002/tesq.431
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking One Law to Uphold Another: How Schools Provide Services to English Learners with Disabilities

Abstract: Inadequate and incomplete educational services for English learners (ELs) with disabilities is a common civil rights issue in the U.S. K-12 education system. Although the federal government has documented that schools are instituting policies of providing only one set of services, such as special education or EL supports, there is little understanding as to why this practice persists in spite of educational laws and policies. Through a qualitative comparative case study that draws on two complementary theories… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
38
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 35 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
1
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The second policy area for ELSWDs pertains to service provision. Research has found that ELSWDs may be inappropriately withheld from either EL or special education services altogether as schools and districts attempt to interpret and comply with state and federal law on service provision requirements (Kangas, 2018). ELSWDs may also be withheld from particular services, such as bilingual programs, due to misconceptions about students' abilities to succeed in such settings (Park, 2014).…”
Section: Policy Area #1: Addressing the Diversity Of English Learner mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second policy area for ELSWDs pertains to service provision. Research has found that ELSWDs may be inappropriately withheld from either EL or special education services altogether as schools and districts attempt to interpret and comply with state and federal law on service provision requirements (Kangas, 2018). ELSWDs may also be withheld from particular services, such as bilingual programs, due to misconceptions about students' abilities to succeed in such settings (Park, 2014).…”
Section: Policy Area #1: Addressing the Diversity Of English Learner mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Department of Justice & U.S. Department of Education, 2015). Once students have the classifications of English learner and student with disability , these institutional designations afford them access to supportive services needed for their academic progress and linguistic development, and yet schools often wrestle with the demands of providing dual supportive services (Kangas, 2014, 2017a, 2018; U.S. Department of Justice & U.S. Department of Education, 2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Department of Justice & U.S. Department of Education, 2015). In fact, service provision for ELs with disabilities is an enterprise that may be accompanied with inequities in learning opportunities, as students experience restricted access to the ELD services needed for the second language (L2) and academic development during their elementary years (Kangas, 2017b, 2018).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The issues in the district concerning ELLs and special education identification are not unique to the PSD. Kangas (2018) The guidance connects to IDEA (Individuals with Disabilities Education Act) and…”
Section: National and State Policy Guidance For Ells With Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Given the flexible structure of language policy for ELLs and special education, the ways in which educators interpreted and implemented these guidelines varied somewhat between schools in the study. tests alone, even if given in more than one language, for diagnosing learning disabilities in multilingual students has been questioned amply in research (e.g., Abedi, 2006;Artiles & Ortiz, 2001;Kangas, 2018;Figueroa, 2002;MacSwan, 2002;Sullivan, 2001), she receives treatment at the hospital geared at common expressions and "metalinguistic skills" such as differentiating sounds in English and Spanish.…”
Section: National and State Policy Guidance For Ells With Disabilitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%