Breaking Down the Barriers to Low Impact Development in Colorado

Earles, Andrew; Rapp, Derek; Clary, Jane; Lopitz, Janice

doi:10.1061/41036(342)91

Cited by 13 publications

(12 citation statements)

References 0 publications

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…Numerous barriers to innovation adoption are identified in related subjects of water conservation, green building techniques, and LID in general (Barnhill and Smardon, 2012;City of Toronto, 2006;Earles et al, 2009;Hood, 2008;Jordaan and Stevens, 2007). Potential barrier examples include adopter's physical capacity, knowledge, awareness, attitudes, and perceptions; expense; uncertainty; and risk levels associated with the technical innovation (Barnhill and Smardon, 2012;Earles et al, 2009;Hood, 2008;Jordaan and Stevens, 2007).…”

Section: Barriers To the Adoption Of Residential Permeable Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 97%

“…But financial instruments may not always be sufficient for encouraging LID (Carter and Fowler, 2008;Rodriguez et al, 2008). Therefore, identification of all social and economic barriers to LID practices is important to encourage adoption (Carter and Fowler, 2008;Earles et al, 2009;Jordaan and Stevens, 2007;Rodriguez et al, 2008).…”

Section: Kitchener Casementioning

confidence: 97%

“…Different levels of government can also apply specific influential policies to encourage adoption (Carter and Fowler, 2008;Vachon and Menz, 2006). Barrier identification is essential for determining suitable mechanisms and approaches to encourage adoption (Earles et al, 2009;Jordaan and Stevens, 2007).…”

Section: Barriers To the Adoption Of Residential Permeable Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 98%

“…Barriers may be lessened through the efforts of public-and private-sector groups, including private firms, community nongovernmental organizations, and watershed groups (Earles et al, 2009;Genskow and Wood, 2011;Vachon and Menz, 2006). However, to encourage innovation adoption and implementation, government support is essential (Rodriguez et al, 2008).…”

Section: Barriers To the Adoption Of Residential Permeable Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

“…These social barriers must be mitigated to encourage residential adoption of green technologies (Earles et al, 2009;Zhao et al, 2012). Barriers may be lessened through the efforts of public-and private-sector groups, including private firms, community nongovernmental organizations, and watershed groups (Earles et al, 2009;Genskow and Wood, 2011;Vachon and Menz, 2006).…”

Section: Barriers To the Adoption Of Residential Permeable Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 4 more Smart Citations

Research Article: Assessing the Social and Economic Barriers to Permeable Surface Utilization for Residential Driveways in Kitchener, Canada

Côté¹,

Wolfe

2014

Environmental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Barriers To the Adoption Of Residential Permeable Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Kitchener Casementioning

confidence: 97%

Section: Barriers To the Adoption Of Residential Permeable Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 98%

Section: Barriers To the Adoption Of Residential Permeable Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

Section: Barriers To the Adoption Of Residential Permeable Surfacesmentioning

confidence: 99%

See 3 more Smart Citations

Research Article: Assessing the Social and Economic Barriers to Permeable Surface Utilization for Residential Driveways in Kitchener, Canada

Côté¹,

Wolfe

2014

Environmental Practice

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Indicators of an Industry in Transition

Bernold¹,

AbouRizk²

2010

Managing Performance in Construction

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Flood vulnerability characteristics considering environmental justice and urban disaster prevention plan in Seoul, Korea

Son

Ban²

2022

Nat Hazards

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

This study aimed to evaluate environmental injustice and analyze ood vulnerability characteristics in consideration of environmental justice and urban ood disaster prevention planning. We investigated various urban disaster prevention factors applied to the urban development process in Seoul from the perspective of environmental justice. Flood risk areas were identi ed and ood damage data from 2000 to 2018 were collected. Furthermore, a panel analysis was performed and the nal model was selected. The ood vulnerability characteristics were found to be detached houses having basements, aged detached houses, land area for detached houses, public assistance recipients, and population aged 65 years or above, which had impact factors of 8.323, 3.781, -2.877, 3.257, and 2.637, respectively. The results indicate that not only the socially vulnerable population lacks the ability to respond to oods, but buildings and areas with poor residential environments also suffer from ood damage. This implies that there is socioeconomically disproportionate exposure (termed as environmental injustice) in the process of urban ood prevention planning and urban development. Our results can contribute qualitatively and quantitatively to prepare a ood prevention plan based on environmental justice paradigm.

show abstract

Breaking Down the Barriers to Low Impact Development in Colorado

Cited by 13 publications

References 0 publications

Research Article: Assessing the Social and Economic Barriers to Permeable Surface Utilization for Residential Driveways in Kitchener, Canada

Research Article: Assessing the Social and Economic Barriers to Permeable Surface Utilization for Residential Driveways in Kitchener, Canada

Indicators of an Industry in Transition

Flood vulnerability characteristics considering environmental justice and urban disaster prevention plan in Seoul, Korea

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About