2020
DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.3682293
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breaking Down Status

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 10 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…It follows, therefore, that the identity categories on which status depends, whether defined by state or communal vernaculars, "can become contested or rendered obsolete," making the "mandatory, bundled nature" of status, including its mandatory rules, subject to debate. 28 In Representing God and American Shtetl, I find actors who challenge ideas about progressive society as one constituted by autonomous individuals freed from communal bonds; they also skillfully advance communal visions through state institutions-whether legislatures or courts or public education boards-that valorize this view of the modern political subject. However, the two sets of authors arrive at different conclusions about what their interlocutors are doing when they engage the state; the conclusions I reach based on the evidence presented also sometimes differ from what an author claims that evidence shows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It follows, therefore, that the identity categories on which status depends, whether defined by state or communal vernaculars, "can become contested or rendered obsolete," making the "mandatory, bundled nature" of status, including its mandatory rules, subject to debate. 28 In Representing God and American Shtetl, I find actors who challenge ideas about progressive society as one constituted by autonomous individuals freed from communal bonds; they also skillfully advance communal visions through state institutions-whether legislatures or courts or public education boards-that valorize this view of the modern political subject. However, the two sets of authors arrive at different conclusions about what their interlocutors are doing when they engage the state; the conclusions I reach based on the evidence presented also sometimes differ from what an author claims that evidence shows.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%