2009
DOI: 10.1038/nphys1273
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakdown of the nuclear-spin-temperature approach in quantum-dot demagnetization experiments

Abstract: The physics of interacting nuclear spins arranged on a crystalline lattice is generally described using a thermodynamic framework 1 and the concept of spin temperature. In the past, experimental studies in bulk solid-state systems have proven this concept to be not only correct 2,3 but also vital for the understanding of experimental observations 4 . Here we show, using demagnetization experiments, that the concept of spin temperature in general fails to describe the mesoscopic nuclear-spin ensemble of a quant… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
86
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(92 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
6
86
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results strongly suggest that the presence of a spin polarized electron in the dot, given by τ c , has a direct influence on the nuclear spin relaxation time T d . This agrees with the observation of long nuclear spin memory times only for unpopulated QDs [28]. Nuclear spin depolarisation mechanisms linked to the presence of the electron in the dot could be direct through Knight field fluctuations [29], or indirect through local fluctuations of the electric field gradients, i.e.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…Our results strongly suggest that the presence of a spin polarized electron in the dot, given by τ c , has a direct influence on the nuclear spin relaxation time T d . This agrees with the observation of long nuclear spin memory times only for unpopulated QDs [28]. Nuclear spin depolarisation mechanisms linked to the presence of the electron in the dot could be direct through Knight field fluctuations [29], or indirect through local fluctuations of the electric field gradients, i.e.…”
supporting
confidence: 90%
“…From the measurements of the nuclear spin depolarization in the dark, we observe decay times of up to 1000 s in both QDs type A and B. This is significantly longer than in natural fluctuation GaAs/AlGaAs dots where decay times of ∼ 40 s were found, 37 and is comparable to the decay times in self-assembled InP 47 and InGaAs 48 QDs. The enhanced stability of the nuclear spin polarization in the NFDE dots can be understood from the NMR spectra in Figs.…”
Section: Qd Bmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Nuclear spin depolarization can occur via flip-flops between interacting (neighboring) nuclei, giving rise to nuclear spin diffusion. However, in most QDs the nuclear Zeeman splitting matching required for such nuclear-nuclear flip-flops is not fulfilled owing to quadrupole interactions occurring mainly as a result of strain 13,19,60,[64][65][66] . Thus nuclear spin diffusion is typically suppressed in QDs 36,60,61,63 .…”
Section: Dynamic Nuclear Polarizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This in principle can be achieved by cooling nuclear spins to ultra-low sub-μK temperatures using adiabatic demagnetization (AD), although first attempts in self-assembled dots experienced difficulties owing to strong quadrupole effects 65 . In future, similar experiments could be attempted in unstrained GaAs dots.…”
Section: Future Directions and Other Materialsmentioning
confidence: 99%