1952
DOI: 10.1038/169287a0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakdown of the Lambert-Beer Law

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
13
0

Year Published

1959
1959
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
13
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The technically simplest method for the reduction of the multiple scattering is to minimize the optical path length . Another optical approach is to reduce the beam cross section and the aperture of the detector …”
Section: Basics Of the Statistical Extinction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The technically simplest method for the reduction of the multiple scattering is to minimize the optical path length . Another optical approach is to reduce the beam cross section and the aperture of the detector …”
Section: Basics Of the Statistical Extinction Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Hence the effective impact of multiple scattering on extinction measurements is a question of receiver type and design. Examples of this can be found in a large number of publications, only few of which are cited here [2,7,9,221. In a plot of particle concentration versus path length Az (Figure 7), the domain of disturbances from multiple scattering is delimited by a hyperbola.…”
Section: Steric Interactions Versus Multiple Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…k ----x 4 a 4 Assuming a regular cubic lattice of spherical particles, the a/A 5 0.3 criterion may be used to estimate the particle volume concentration which is critical for the onset of dependent scattering: (7) As Eq. (7) shows, the critical concentration depends on the particle size parameter nx/L Going more into detail, two limiting cases of dependent scattering may be distinguished: i) If the criterion a / l 5 0.3 is used with particles smaller than the wavelength, x 4 A, this implies that the average distances between particle centres are small compared with the wavelength even for low concentrations.…”
Section: Steric Interactions Versus Dependent Scatteringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, many studies have found that Beer's law only works for analytes with low concentrations and that a nonlinear relationship may exist between the absorbance and the concentration when the analytes are at high‐concentration levels . These deviations may be ascribed to the occurrence of fluorescence, scattering, physical interactions or chemical equilibrium, the refractive index of the solvent, and many other effects . The errors introduced by using Beer's law without correction can easily exceed one order of magnitude, so the limits should be clearly understood before applying Beer's law for any absorbance‐related analysis .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14,15 These deviations may be ascribed to the occurrence of fluorescence, scattering, physical interactions or chemical equilibrium, the refractive index of the solvent, and many other effects. [14][15][16][17][18] The errors introduced by using Beer's law without correction can easily exceed one order of magnitude, so the limits should be clearly understood before applying Beer's law for any absorbance-related analysis. 19 Because of the low sensitivity of CD detectors for CD detection, a high concentration is often necessary to acquire sufficient CD signals for ee analysis.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%