2012
DOI: 10.1103/physrevlett.109.176101
|View full text |Cite|
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakdown in the Wetting Transparency of Graphene

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

32
313
1
2

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 330 publications
(357 citation statements)
references
References 39 publications
32
313
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…The interface markers of the water droplet are obtained by applying the method that Rishi Raj used [21]. The result shows that the contact angle of water droplets on graphite is about 85.9°, which is in good agreement with experimental or other simulation data (80°−90°) [21][22][23][24][25]. Adamson et al [25] showed a contact angle of 86° by experimental In our simulation, the interatomic interaction is described by COMPASS force field.…”
Section: Model and Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The interface markers of the water droplet are obtained by applying the method that Rishi Raj used [21]. The result shows that the contact angle of water droplets on graphite is about 85.9°, which is in good agreement with experimental or other simulation data (80°−90°) [21][22][23][24][25]. Adamson et al [25] showed a contact angle of 86° by experimental In our simulation, the interatomic interaction is described by COMPASS force field.…”
Section: Model and Methodssupporting
confidence: 81%
“…Yet, the relatively few studies available are not in agreement, especially on the effect of the substrate. 29,60,61 To the best of our knowledge, the intrinsic wettability of suspended graphene has only been predicted theoretically by molecular dynamics, 62 and has not been measured, due to experimental challenges. Our studies suggest that Cu-supported graphene exhibits stronger wettability compared with a free-standing graphene sheet.…”
Section: Wetting and Electrochemistry Of Supported And Suspended Grapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is in line with theoretical studies showing that the contact angle of water on suspended graphene is higher than on Cu-supported graphene. 29,[62][63][64] To further investigate the wettability of the suspended graphene membrane, approach and retract experiments were carried out in which the meniscus of an SECCM pipet was pushed further against the graphene with the precise control of the z-piezo, while iDC against z-piezo displacement was recorded, and the reverse (pull-off) of the meniscus was also measured. An example of these approach and retract curves (with ion conductance current iDC normalized to the initial value of the approach iIni, iDC/iIni) is presented in Figure 7 (which is typical of 3 different experiments).…”
Section: Wetting and Electrochemistry Of Supported And Suspended Grapmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Calculations of the van der Waals and short range repulsive forces suggest that a graphene layer would alter the wetting properties on superhydrophilic and superhydrophobic substrates. 10 Hence, wetting transparency of graphene will break down on such superhydrophilic or superhydrophobic substrates. Contact angle measurements by Raj et al, 11 on the other hand, demonstrated that contact angles are independent of the number of graphene layers on a glass or on a silicon oxide substrate.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…adsorbed water molecule, one finds %10 22 molecules on the surface and %2. 10 18 molecules on the edges. Hence, the edge effects are negligible since they are 4 orders of magnitude smaller.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%