2018
DOI: 10.1007/s12520-018-0738-z
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Breakage, scarring, scratches and explosions: understanding impact trace formation on quartz

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

4
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Both lithic and organic artefacts from southern African Middle Stone Age contexts have been interpreted as arrowheads based on use damage e.g. 36 38 , with some of the lithic evidence later challenged 50 53 . The arguments for attributing the proposed stone and bone weapon tips to bow and arrow are exclusively size-related 36 , 38 .…”
Section: Emergence Of Long-range Weaponry: Current Perspectives and M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both lithic and organic artefacts from southern African Middle Stone Age contexts have been interpreted as arrowheads based on use damage e.g. 36 38 , with some of the lithic evidence later challenged 50 53 . The arguments for attributing the proposed stone and bone weapon tips to bow and arrow are exclusively size-related 36 , 38 .…”
Section: Emergence Of Long-range Weaponry: Current Perspectives and M...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While the flint raw material (Harmignies, Belgium) and the artefact morphology are not exact matches to the Pataud material, the reference collection provides a suitable starting point for interpreting the Level 3 collection. Laterally hafted armatures, on the other hand, are currently less well represented in the reference material [but see 71,105,115], and at the moment morphologies directly comparable to the Pataud artefacts are not available. As artefact morphometrics significantly affect impact fracture patterns [11,14,107,116], this is an important limitation of the present reference collection, and further experimentation is needed to properly address the hypotheses formulated in this study.…”
Section: Experimental Projectile Reference Collectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…TRAIL can be considered representative for a broad range of trace causes, including production (Rots 2010b), hafting (Rots 2002(Rots , 2010a and tool use (Rots 2002;Taipale 2020;Taipale and Rots 2021;Tomasso 2021). TRAIL also integrates a large number of projectiles used with different propulsion modes (e.g., Coppe 2020; Coppe and Rots 2017;de la Peña et al 2018;Lepers and Rots 2020;Taipale and Rots 2019;Tomasso et al 2018) and experimental tools from experiments focused on taphonomic processes (e.g., Michel et al 2019) and post-excavation procedures, such as sieving or storage (Cnuts 2021;Rots 2010a). TRAIL also contains a library for residues, with 500 residue samples and a large number of tools specifically devoted to this topic (e.g., Cnuts 2021;Cnuts andRots 2017, 2018;.…”
Section: Reference Collection Trailmentioning
confidence: 99%