2001
DOI: 10.1186/bcr419
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BRCA1 and BRCA2 mutations in a population-based study of male breast cancer

Abstract: IntroductionMale breast cancer (MBC) is a rare disease and little is known about its aetiology. However, female first-degree relatives of MBC cases are at increased risk of breast cancer [1][2][3][4][5][6], which suggests that there is an inherited component to the disease. Several genes that are associated with a high lifetime risk of breast cancer in women have been identified during the past decade. One of these, BRCA2, has also been shown to confer a significant risk of breast cancer in men, and a recent s… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

9
111
3
13

Year Published

2003
2003
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 167 publications
(136 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
(21 reference statements)
9
111
3
13
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results are in agreement with the studies of Bergthorsson et al (2001), de la Hoya et al (2002 and Ford et al (1998); however, others failed to demonstrate such a predictive value (Couch et al, 1997;Steinmann et al, 2001). Male breast cancer in combination with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer was indicative of finding a BRCA2 mutation (P ¼ 0.002), which is consistent with a recent population-based British study (Basham et al, 2002). In none of the four Belgian sporadic male breast cancer patients a mutation was identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…Our results are in agreement with the studies of Bergthorsson et al (2001), de la Hoya et al (2002 and Ford et al (1998); however, others failed to demonstrate such a predictive value (Couch et al, 1997;Steinmann et al, 2001). Male breast cancer in combination with a family history of breast/ovarian cancer was indicative of finding a BRCA2 mutation (P ¼ 0.002), which is consistent with a recent population-based British study (Basham et al, 2002). In none of the four Belgian sporadic male breast cancer patients a mutation was identified.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…(18) Similar to other studies (19)(20)(21)(22) we found no BRCA1 mutation carriers among our 16 non-Jewish patients.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…The risk of breast cancer in female first-degree relatives of male breast cancer patients has been estimated to be 2.4 times greater than the risk in the general population (Basham et al, 2002), consistent with a common genetic susceptibility to male and female breast cancer. However, BRCA1 and BRCA2 alone cannot explain all the observed FRRs (Basham et al, 2002).…”
Section: Risks Of Cancers At Other Sites and Risks Of Second Cancersmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…However, BRCA1 and BRCA2 alone cannot explain all the observed FRRs (Basham et al, 2002). To allow for this residual effect, we assumed that the polygenic component in the model also applied to male patients.…”
Section: Risks Of Cancers At Other Sites and Risks Of Second Cancersmentioning
confidence: 99%