2017
DOI: 10.1373/clinchem.2016.263897
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BRCA Testing by Single-Molecule Molecular Inversion Probes

Abstract: smMIP-based genetic testing enables automated and reliable analysis of the coding sequences of BRCA1 and BRCA2. The use of single-molecule tags, double-tiled targeted enrichment, and capturing and sequencing in duplo, in combination with automated library preparation and data analysis, results in a robust process and reduces routine turnaround times. Furthermore, smMIP-based copy number variation analysis could make independent copy number variation tools like multiplex ligation-dependent probes amplification … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

3
63
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 53 publications
(69 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
3
63
0
Order By: Relevance
“…MIPs provide a high target sensitivity (99%) and specificity (98%) at low costs and minimal DNA requirements, and can be easily multiplexed to target regions of multiple genes in a single reaction [18]. Implementation of this methodology in routine diagnostics requires further adjustments to guarantee minimal costs and optimal turnaround times, which are highly dependent on sample supply, available infrastructure, and local personnel costs [19, 20]. For a MIP-based breast cancer susceptibility gene panel, a turnaround time of 4 days has been described [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…MIPs provide a high target sensitivity (99%) and specificity (98%) at low costs and minimal DNA requirements, and can be easily multiplexed to target regions of multiple genes in a single reaction [18]. Implementation of this methodology in routine diagnostics requires further adjustments to guarantee minimal costs and optimal turnaround times, which are highly dependent on sample supply, available infrastructure, and local personnel costs [19, 20]. For a MIP-based breast cancer susceptibility gene panel, a turnaround time of 4 days has been described [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Implementation of this methodology in routine diagnostics requires further adjustments to guarantee minimal costs and optimal turnaround times, which are highly dependent on sample supply, available infrastructure, and local personnel costs [19, 20]. For a MIP-based breast cancer susceptibility gene panel, a turnaround time of 4 days has been described [19]. Therefore, we consider MIP-based sequencing as a highly suitable replacement of Sanger sequencing for clinical genetic testing [17].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Fifth, our analytic strategy enables the robust detection of MSI status without the need for sequencing patient-matched normal material (22). Lastly, the costs of library construction and required sequencing coverage by this approach are low, enabling economic testing of patient samples at scale (33); here, specimens were prepared and sequenced for <$80 USD in material costs each.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Third, the quantitative nature of smMIP data enables computational inference of the genotypes of major and multiple minor cell populations without the need for independently genotyping donor and recipient material, as has proven necessary by both conventional STR (10,12) and PCR-based copy number deletion assays (12,13), and eliminates the need for calibration by standard curve (12). Fourth, smMIP capture is cost effective and readily scalable to multiple patient specimens (38), facilitating high throughput testing in clinical practice.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%