Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
This white paper explores the potential application of the concept of the "common concern of humankind" as a framework for a new international legally binding instrument for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction, currently being negotiated by States under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, as outlined in United Nations General Assembly Resolution 69/292. It reviews the history of the common concern of humankind concept, its relevance in international treaties and case law, and the potential legal and policy implications of the concept's use in a new marine biodiversity agreement.Although less examined than global principles such as the common heritage of mankind, the common concern of humankind concept has a significant history of use by the international community for global environmental issues. Environmental treaties throughout the 20th century referred to shared global problems using various phrases that foreshadow the common concern of humankind. By the end of the century, the Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992) formally expressed the conservation of biological diversity and "change in the Earth's climate and its adverse effects" as common concerns of humankind, respectively. Most recently, the Paris Agreement (2015) again acknowledged climate change as a common concern.As States negotiate a new legal regime to govern the high seas, this paper suggests that reaffirming the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in ABNJ as a common concern of humankind-already acknowledged by Parties to the CBD-can emphasize certain key principles of interest to States, namely: intergenerational equity, international solidarity, shared decision making and accountability, and benefit and burden sharing through financial cooperation. Moreover, its use would forge a meaningful, logical, and necessary link between the new instrument, the CBD, and international efforts to combat climate change. This paper seeks to show that the current discussions around marine biodiversity in ABNJ present a unique opportunity for the international community to build on the successes of the recent climate change negotiations and reaffirm the critical value of marine biodiversity for humankind.
This white paper explores the potential application of the concept of the "common concern of humankind" as a framework for a new international legally binding instrument for the conservation and sustainable use of marine biological diversity in areas beyond national jurisdiction, currently being negotiated by States under the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea, as outlined in United Nations General Assembly Resolution 69/292. It reviews the history of the common concern of humankind concept, its relevance in international treaties and case law, and the potential legal and policy implications of the concept's use in a new marine biodiversity agreement.Although less examined than global principles such as the common heritage of mankind, the common concern of humankind concept has a significant history of use by the international community for global environmental issues. Environmental treaties throughout the 20th century referred to shared global problems using various phrases that foreshadow the common concern of humankind. By the end of the century, the Convention on Biological Diversity (1992) and the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (1992) formally expressed the conservation of biological diversity and "change in the Earth's climate and its adverse effects" as common concerns of humankind, respectively. Most recently, the Paris Agreement (2015) again acknowledged climate change as a common concern.As States negotiate a new legal regime to govern the high seas, this paper suggests that reaffirming the conservation and sustainable use of marine biodiversity in ABNJ as a common concern of humankind-already acknowledged by Parties to the CBD-can emphasize certain key principles of interest to States, namely: intergenerational equity, international solidarity, shared decision making and accountability, and benefit and burden sharing through financial cooperation. Moreover, its use would forge a meaningful, logical, and necessary link between the new instrument, the CBD, and international efforts to combat climate change. This paper seeks to show that the current discussions around marine biodiversity in ABNJ present a unique opportunity for the international community to build on the successes of the recent climate change negotiations and reaffirm the critical value of marine biodiversity for humankind.
This article provides a comparative analysis of the features of the national legislation of the BRICS countries that regulates the issues of legal responsibility for environmental offenses. The authors consider aspects of the normative consolidation of the rights and obligations of citizens in the field of environmental protection, the types of legal liability and the applicable sanctions for violations of environmental standards provided for by the national legislation of all BRICS countries. The study of the environmental legislation of the BRICS countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South Africa) reveals a number of general and specific directions in environmental policy with the aim of enriching the said countries with positive experience, overcoming difficulties in the organization of environmental management and environmental protection, the prevention of possible errors in the context of global economic and environmental crises, and making recommendations for environmental improvement. Improving the legislation of the BRICS countries in the field of legal liability for environmental offenses by taking into account the positive experience of these countries will help increase the effectiveness of prevention and rectification of negative consequences for the environment in both the Russian Federation and the BRICS association as a whole. Consequently, a comparative legal analysis of national environmental legislation of BRICS countries suggests that the general principles of responsibility for environmental offenses are inherent in all these countries, despite their fundamental differences in history, culture and geographical location.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
hi@scite.ai
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
Copyright © 2024 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.