2017
DOI: 10.1007/s11618-017-0785-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brauchen mehrsprachige Jugendliche eine andere fach- und sprachintegrierte Förderung als einsprachige?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
13
0
8

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(25 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
13
0
8
Order By: Relevance
“…The language-responsive intervention specifically focused on establishing a meaning-related discourse and on constantly verbalizing the connection between graphical, symbolic, and contextual representations using rich discourse practices. When comparing two versions of language-responsive support, engaging students in rich discourse practices of explaining meanings tended to be more effective than focusing on vocabulary (Prediger & Wessel, 2018). This quantitative finding is in line with qualitative findings from other researchers (Moschkovich, 2015).…”
Section: Exploring and Validating Hypothesis 1: Verbalizing Meanings supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The language-responsive intervention specifically focused on establishing a meaning-related discourse and on constantly verbalizing the connection between graphical, symbolic, and contextual representations using rich discourse practices. When comparing two versions of language-responsive support, engaging students in rich discourse practices of explaining meanings tended to be more effective than focusing on vocabulary (Prediger & Wessel, 2018). This quantitative finding is in line with qualitative findings from other researchers (Moschkovich, 2015).…”
Section: Exploring and Validating Hypothesis 1: Verbalizing Meanings supporting
confidence: 86%
“…The teacher's active role in the didactical phases, combined with the well-defined target knowledge, allow for investigations that look at the language of the learner, the language of the teacher and the classroom, and the language of mathematics in an integrated way (Ingram et al 2020;Schütte and Planas 2018). The study also confirms that children with monolingual and relatively schooled backgrounds benefit from language support (Schütte 2014(Schütte , 2018Prediger and Wessel 2018).…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 73%
“…In an earlier publication, Schütte (2014) claimed that "it is not the mastering of general linguistic competences that is most significant for successful subject learning in mathematics, but the gaining of competences in a subject-related academic language" (p. 924). This claim is supported by results in a recent quantitative study, which showed that monolingual pupils with high language proficiency, indeed gain more from language support than multilingual students (Prediger and Wessel 2018).…”
Section: Contextualisation Of the Studysupporting
confidence: 52%
“…The quantitative analysis of the learning gains revealed a low-to-medium effect (intra-group effect size measured by d 0.42) in the control group, but a very strong effect (d 1.22) in the intervention group. Those differences became significant in a later study with a larger cohort (Prediger and Wessel 2018). (Prediger and Wessel 2013, p. 444); "Anteil" in (e) is used deliberately by the authors in their translation of the task.…”
Section: Understanding and Teaching Fractionsmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Within the next project, which is now being funded by the German Research Foundation, we again have some hypotheses that we can validate or reject, and we will generate new questions and new aspects to be studied in greater depth. (Prediger and Wessel 2018) Thus, there's always interplay between hypothesis generation and its validation. Indeed, the categories are really the most important element in terms of theory generation.…”
Section: Can You Describe the Interplay Between 'Theory Development' mentioning
confidence: 99%