2006
DOI: 10.1051/0004-6361:20054154
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branes: cosmological surprise and observational deception

Abstract: Using some supernovae and CMB data, we constrain the Cardassian, Randall-Sundrum, and Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati brane-inspired cosmological models. We show that a transient acceleration and an early loitering period are usually excluded by the data. Moreover, the three models are equivalent to some usual quintessence/ghost dark energy models defined by a barotropic index γ φ depending on the redshift. We calculate this index for each model and show that they mimic a universe close to a ΛCDM model today.

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Such a value is consistent with those found in the literature, i.e., Ω λ = 0.026 which was obtained from a different approach (see Keresztes et al 2007), assuming 4Ω λ Ω Λ = Ω 2 m , and also to the values obtained from statistical analysis which resulted in Ω λ = 0.04 (see, e.g., Dabrowski et al 2004) and Ω λ = 0.02 (Fay 2006). Furthermore, with the high number of sources per year obtained for the GW detector, we obtain a great statistics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Such a value is consistent with those found in the literature, i.e., Ω λ = 0.026 which was obtained from a different approach (see Keresztes et al 2007), assuming 4Ω λ Ω Λ = Ω 2 m , and also to the values obtained from statistical analysis which resulted in Ω λ = 0.04 (see, e.g., Dabrowski et al 2004) and Ω λ = 0.02 (Fay 2006). Furthermore, with the high number of sources per year obtained for the GW detector, we obtain a great statistics.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…In addition to their simplicity, one of the main reasons for their popularity has been the fact that an effective model of this type can mimic a very wide variety of models, ranging from the cosmological constant with EOS equal to ÿ1 to models with variable EOS such as quintessence models and brane inspired models such as that due to Dvali-Gabadadze-Porrati [7,8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Generally, numerical values of cosmological parameters depend on a model in which the experimental data were processed. Recently fits of parameters were made in RSII-like models with positive tension of the brane [21,22,23,24]. The main cosmological parameters obtained in these fits do not considerably differ from those of the standard model used in the present note.…”
Section: Model With Negative Tension Of the Branementioning
confidence: 68%