Branding Post-War Sarajevo

Abstract

After the violent wars of the 1990s, Bosnia and Herzegovina is heavily promoting its tourism industry with the capital city of Sarajevo as the prime destination. Sarajevo became a city of death during 1992-1995, and its siege remains etched in local and global memories as a time of bombing, horrific shelling of locals, and brutal destruction of the city's cultural heritage. Today Sarajevo faces many dilemmas, including how to remember the 1990s trauma and how to represent the city to citizens and foreign visitors. Here we explore how Sarajevo journalists remember the city's recent violent conflict, and how war memory becomes commodified and branded for tourism. Furthermore, we analyse how prominent global media represent Sarajevo as a tourism destination after the war. On the basis of in-depth interviews with Sarajevo journalists, and an analysis of travel reviews in prominent international publications, we argue that Sarajevo is a place where branding and memories converge. Sarajevo is transformed into a tourist attraction where trauma of the past is being sold, while promising some authentic path towards understanding the violent past. Local journalists and global media alike frame the city as a "brand" while celebrating the inherent authenticity of post-war travel in order to promote and sell Sarajevo.

The role of dark commemorative and sport events in peaceful coexistence in the Western Balkans

“…The media represent current events to diverse audiences (Abazi & Doja, 2017) and influence popular perceptions of tourist destinations (Volcic et al, 2014). Accordingly, the media has become an important source of information for tourism researchers (Li et al, 2018).…”

Historic Syrian Cities in the Post-War Period: Balancing Cul-tural Preservation and Tourism Investment

“…The third article is "Branding post-war Sarajevo: Journalism, memories, and dark tourism" by Z. Volcic (2014) [40]. This article examines how Sarajevo has sought to preserve its cultural heritage following the war, despite significant damage caused by conflict and neglect.…”

Peacebuilding and post-conflict tourism: addressing structural violence in Colombia

“…Bringing the discussion back to the tourism realm, we must acknowledge that these imaginaries and dynamics of dispossession have also been reinforced by the tourism industry in various post-conflict spaces. Evidence from Sri Lanka (Buultjens et al, 2016), Cambodia (Winter, 2008) Bosnia and Herzegovina (Volcic et al, 2014), Cyprus (Scott, 2012), and Colombia (Ojeda, 2012), demonstrated that tourism can be a source of structural violence, particularly when large operators advanced their interests to the detriment of several local communities. In these contexts, tourism is used as a gateway for the privatisation of common goods, deregulation, displacement, and the commodification of people, places, cultures, and pasts (B€ uscher & Fletcher, 2017;Devine & Ojeda, 2017).…”