2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.econmod.2006.12.004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brand name collaboration and optimal tariff

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the IOR generates positive outcomes to partners when consumers perceive that the two product categories, brands and countries of origin are compatible and consistent (Lee et al 2013b;Simonin and Ruth 1998). (Park et al 1996;Simonin and Ruth 1998;Fang and Mishra 2002;Washburn et al 2004;Delgado-Ballester and Hernández-Espallardo 2008;Lee et al 2013b) Partner reputation (Park et al 1996;Simonin and Ruth 1998;Voss and Gammoh 2004;Marjit et al 2007;Gammoh et al 2006;Votolato and Unnava 2006;Morgan et al 2007;Delgado-Ballester and Hernández-Espallardo 2008;Lowry et al 2008;Smarandescu et al 2013) Partner selection (Voss and Gammoh 2004;Votolato and Unnava 2006) CHANNEL Capabilities (Yu et al 2011) Previous experience (Yu et al 2011) IOR establishment (Mehta et al 2001;Gilmore et al 2006***;Johnson 1999) IOR configuration (Chen and Chiang 2011;Yu et al 2011) Trust and reliance (Johnson 1999) Leadership (Mehta et al 2001) GENERAL Drivers (Bucklin and Sengupta 1993) Capabilities (Venkatesh et al 2000) IOR reputation (Bucklin and Sengupta 1993) Marketing uncertainty (Venkatesh et al 2000) IOR establishment (Hluškova andŠašikova 2013*;Lee et al 2013a) IOR configuration (Wang and Fesenmaier 2007;…”
Section: The Determinants Of Firm Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This means that the IOR generates positive outcomes to partners when consumers perceive that the two product categories, brands and countries of origin are compatible and consistent (Lee et al 2013b;Simonin and Ruth 1998). (Park et al 1996;Simonin and Ruth 1998;Fang and Mishra 2002;Washburn et al 2004;Delgado-Ballester and Hernández-Espallardo 2008;Lee et al 2013b) Partner reputation (Park et al 1996;Simonin and Ruth 1998;Voss and Gammoh 2004;Marjit et al 2007;Gammoh et al 2006;Votolato and Unnava 2006;Morgan et al 2007;Delgado-Ballester and Hernández-Espallardo 2008;Lowry et al 2008;Smarandescu et al 2013) Partner selection (Voss and Gammoh 2004;Votolato and Unnava 2006) CHANNEL Capabilities (Yu et al 2011) Previous experience (Yu et al 2011) IOR establishment (Mehta et al 2001;Gilmore et al 2006***;Johnson 1999) IOR configuration (Chen and Chiang 2011;Yu et al 2011) Trust and reliance (Johnson 1999) Leadership (Mehta et al 2001) GENERAL Drivers (Bucklin and Sengupta 1993) Capabilities (Venkatesh et al 2000) IOR reputation (Bucklin and Sengupta 1993) Marketing uncertainty (Venkatesh et al 2000) IOR establishment (Hluškova andŠašikova 2013*;Lee et al 2013a) IOR configuration (Wang and Fesenmaier 2007;…”
Section: The Determinants Of Firm Outcomesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This may be because Ford made the products more appealing to the customers because of its brand name. Marjit et al (2007) provide several examples of brand name collaboration. Aaker and Keller (1990) and Tauber (1988) on brand extensions reveal that co-branding arrangements forms positive consumer perceptions about a particular brand.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At the same time, brand name is an important communication tool that is used to compose powerful brand attitudes (Grace & O'Cass, 2005). Brand name makes the product more attractive for the customers and increases their consumptions (Marjit, Beladi, & Kabiraj, 2007). Grace and O'Cass (2005) set forth that controlled communication and brand name have an important effect on customer satisfaction, brand attitudes, and intention of the customer about using the brand again in their studies about effects of "controlled communication, uncontrolled communication, and brand name" variables on customer satisfaction, attitudes, and purchasing intention again.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%