2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijms.2004.03.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branching ratios for the dissociative recombination of hydrocarbon ions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
25
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
1
25
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This table replaces Table VIII of the original database [8]. are in accordance with the experimental finding in [41] that the total branching ratio of all C2-containing channels is 0.78, and that for CX+CY+... channels is 0.22. However, for the individual channels the suggested branching ratios within these two groups are fairly uncertain and are determined following the trends of RDR in other CH [42,43].…”
Section: Dr For Ethane Familysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…This table replaces Table VIII of the original database [8]. are in accordance with the experimental finding in [41] that the total branching ratio of all C2-containing channels is 0.78, and that for CX+CY+... channels is 0.22. However, for the individual channels the suggested branching ratios within these two groups are fairly uncertain and are determined following the trends of RDR in other CH [42,43].…”
Section: Dr For Ethane Familysupporting
confidence: 84%
“…At low pressure (Fahr et al 1999, Stoliarov et al 2000, Hébrard et al 2013, Thorn et al 2000 → Rate constant in the 10-50K deduced from (Sabbah et al 2007), branching ratio mainly from (Savee et al 2012) (see also (Knyazev et al 1992, Cavallotti et al 2014, Leonori et al 2015 35.! 86.7 % de C 3 H x (supposed to be C 3 H 4 **) and 13.3% of CH x + C 2 H y (Angelova et al 2004a, Angelova et al 2004b. We supposed than C 3 H 4 ** leads mainly to C 3 H 3 by comparison with C 3 H 4 photodissociation (Seki & Okabe 1992, Ni et al 1999, Harich et al 2000a, Harich et al 2000b.…”
Section: Review Of the Gas Phase Reactionsmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…We do not report on C 2 H + and C + 4 because OSU-01-2007 used experimental DR-BR (Ehlerding et al 2004;Heber et al 2006). For C 3 H + , in spite of existing partial measurements (Angelova et al 2004b), the OSU-01-2007 database uses the same probability for the emission of C or H. Although Leung et al (1984) assumed 100% of H emission, equiprobability was proposed by Millar et al (1988), based on more detailed calculations. The HVC-SUBR are indeed between these two extreme situations.…”
Section: New Brs For Astrochemistry Databasesmentioning
confidence: 99%