2006
DOI: 10.1007/s11464-005-0027-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branching Processes with Immigration and Related Topics

Abstract: This is a survey on recent progresses in the study of branching processes with immigration, generalized Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes and affine Markov processes. We mainly focus on the applications of skew convolution semigroups and the connections in those processes.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
20
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(20 citation statements)
references
References 69 publications
0
20
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This implies that (w n , n ≥ 0) increases to a non-negative function w ∞ . By monotone convergence theorem (for H µ s ψ 0 (w(r))1 {wn(r)>0} dr and the integral with φ) and dominated convergence theorem (for H µ s ψ 0 (w(r))1 {wn(r)≤0} dr), we deduce from (11), that w ∞ solves w(s) = 0 for s > H µ and Notice that w ∞ (s) ∈ [0, ∞] and the two sides of the previous equality may be infinite. Thanks to Proposition 2.1, and since ψ 0 − φ is a branching mechanism (see Remark 3.2), there exists a unique locally bounded non-negative solution of (12), which we shall callw.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…This implies that (w n , n ≥ 0) increases to a non-negative function w ∞ . By monotone convergence theorem (for H µ s ψ 0 (w(r))1 {wn(r)>0} dr and the integral with φ) and dominated convergence theorem (for H µ s ψ 0 (w(r))1 {wn(r)≤0} dr), we deduce from (11), that w ∞ solves w(s) = 0 for s > H µ and Notice that w ∞ (s) ∈ [0, ∞] and the two sides of the previous equality may be infinite. Thanks to Proposition 2.1, and since ψ 0 − φ is a branching mechanism (see Remark 3.2), there exists a unique locally bounded non-negative solution of (12), which we shall callw.…”
Section: 2mentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Let us therefore first consider separately the branching structure. In practice the evolution of the number of nodes (i.e., the amount of messages disseminated in the network) is governed by continuous state branching processes (CSBPs), introduced by Jiřina [1958] and studied by various researchers during the past decades [see for example Lamperti, 1967a,b, Feller, 1951, Grey, 1974, Silverstein, 1969, Bingham, 1976, Le Gall, 1999, Li, 2006, Kale and Deshmukh, 1992, Li, 2009, Caballero et al, 2009, Li, 2012a, Kashikar and Deshmukh, 2012. In order to understand what a CSBP is, we start by describing a related discrete time and discrete state space model: the so-called Galton-Watson process.…”
Section: Mathematical Background: Super Brownian Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The concept of two-dimensional CB-processes was introduced by Watanabe (1969) and the corresponding processes with immigration have been systematically studied by several authors in the measure-valued setting; see, e.g., Li (2006b) for the survey on the topic. Two-dimensional CBI-processes are included in a wide class of so-called affine processes and many interesting applications of the class of processes have been found in mathematical finance; see Duffie et al (2003).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%