1985
DOI: 10.1016/s0007-1536(85)80273-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branching in Spadicoides

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(13 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…S. bina S. Hughes) differ mainly in branching of conidiophores and catenation of conidia. Diplococcium spicatum produces catenate conidia on branched conidiophores, whereas Spadicoides bina produces solitary conidia on unbranched conidiophores (Hughes 1958;Ellis 1963;Sinclair et al 1985;Goh and Hyde 1996). The conidiophore branching was considered to be taxonomically more important at the generic level than conidial catenation by earlier mycologists (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…S. bina S. Hughes) differ mainly in branching of conidiophores and catenation of conidia. Diplococcium spicatum produces catenate conidia on branched conidiophores, whereas Spadicoides bina produces solitary conidia on unbranched conidiophores (Hughes 1958;Ellis 1963;Sinclair et al 1985;Goh and Hyde 1996). The conidiophore branching was considered to be taxonomically more important at the generic level than conidial catenation by earlier mycologists (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ellis 1963Ellis , 1971aEllis , b, 1972Wang 1976;Wang and Sutton 1982). Sinclair et al (1985), however, stated that at the generic level, conidiophore branching is taxonomically less important than conidial catenation, and emended the generic description of Spadicoides to include species that produce solitary conidia from conidiophores that may be simple or branched. This generic delineation based on a single anamorphic character has been accepted by several authors (e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A separação entre os dois gêneros é feita com base na catenação dos conídios. Spadicoides possui coní-dios solitários, enquanto Diplococcium apresenta conídios catenados (Sinclair et al 1985, Goh & Hyde 1996. Análises moleculares sugerem que algumas espécies de Spadicoides estão filogeneticamente relacionadas com as classes Dothideomycetes e Sordariomycetes (Shenoy et al 2010), revelando a natureza polifilética do gênero.…”
Section: Resultsunclassified
“…For separating these two genera, Wang and Sutton (1982) used the unbranched conidiophores as an important character of Spadicoides. Sinclair et al (1985), however, adopted the catenation of conidia to separate these genera, and they removed four Spadicoides species, including S. stoveri, to Diplococcium. Twenty-one species were accepted in the review of Diplococcium by Goh and Hyde (1998).…”
Section: Diplococcium Stoverimentioning
confidence: 99%