2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.spa.2020.02.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branching diffusion representation of semi-linear elliptic PDEs and estimation using Monte Carlo method

Abstract: We study semi-linear elliptic PDEs with polynomial non-linearity and provide a probabilistic representation of their solution using branching diffusion processes. When the non-linearity involves the unknown function but not its derivatives, we extend previous results in the literature by showing that our probabilistic representation provides a solution to the PDE without assuming its existence. In the general case, we derive a new representation of the solution by using marked branching diffusion processes and… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
26
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(26 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
26
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the following we also add some comments on shortcomings and possible generalizations of Theorem 1.1. In particular, we observe that the driver f : Ê → Ê in the BSDEs in (3) does only depend on the solution processes…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In the following we also add some comments on shortcomings and possible generalizations of Theorem 1.1. In particular, we observe that the driver f : Ê → Ê in the BSDEs in (3) does only depend on the solution processes…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…In Theorem 1.1 we do not assume that the filtererd probability space (Ω, F , È, (F t ) t∈[0,T ] ) satisfies the usual conditions in the sense that for all t ∈ [0, T ) it holds that {A ∈ F : È(A) = 0} ⊆ F t = ∩ s∈(t,T ] F s . The (F t ) t∈[0,T ] -predictable stochastic processes Y d : [0, T ] × Ω → Ê, d ∈ AE, in the last but fifth line of Theorem 1.1 are the solution processes of the BSDEs in (3).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The validity of this method in the path-dependent case, and for further analytic nonlinearities which are of the power type in the triple (u, ∂ x u, ∂ 2 xx T u) is analyzed in [13,14,15,16]. We also refer to Agarwal and Claisse [1] for the extension to elliptic semilinear PDEs, and Bouchard, Tan, Warin & Zou [5] for Lipschitz nonlinearity in the pair (v, ∂ x v). A critical ingredient for the extension is the use of Galton-Watson trees weighted by some Malliavin automatic differentiation weights.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We refer in particular to [12] for the zeroth-order case and [11] for the rst-order case. We also refer to [4] for an extension of the branching di usion approach to the case of locally analytic nonlinearities, [3] for the case of Lipschitz nonlinearities, [13] for higher-order partial di erential equations, and [1] for an extension to elliptic equations. The main contribution of this article is to extend the branching di usion approach to the case of nonlocal terms inside the nonlinearity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%