1996
DOI: 10.1016/0361-9230(96)00033-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branched connections to the septum and to the entorhinal cortex from the hippocampus, amygdala, and diencephalon in the rat

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

2003
2003
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, most subicular neurons tend to distribute their axon to only a single target structure or to a very limited number of structures, whereas the axon of CA1 neurons collateralizes to a much larger number of brain structures (Naber and Witter, 1998;Ishizuka, 2001). The projections to the septum may be an exception to this overall rule, since quite a few studies indicate that up to 50% of subicular neurons that project to the lateral septum also project to at least one other brain area such as the EC (Swanson et al, 1981;Donovan and Wyss, 1983;Calderazzo et al, 1996). The subicular projections to the septal complex, the nucleus accumbens, the mammillary nuclei and adjacent hypothalamic regions are the most prominent ones.…”
Section: Efferentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…However, most subicular neurons tend to distribute their axon to only a single target structure or to a very limited number of structures, whereas the axon of CA1 neurons collateralizes to a much larger number of brain structures (Naber and Witter, 1998;Ishizuka, 2001). The projections to the septum may be an exception to this overall rule, since quite a few studies indicate that up to 50% of subicular neurons that project to the lateral septum also project to at least one other brain area such as the EC (Swanson et al, 1981;Donovan and Wyss, 1983;Calderazzo et al, 1996). The subicular projections to the septal complex, the nucleus accumbens, the mammillary nuclei and adjacent hypothalamic regions are the most prominent ones.…”
Section: Efferentsmentioning
confidence: 95%
“…During stress, it is well established that epinephrine released from the adrenal cortex can result in the activation of adrenergic receptors that facilitate memory function [26,37,43]. Adrenergic receptors found on vagal afferents project to the nucleus of the solitary tract and can subsequently activate neurons that project to the amygdala [11]. The amygdala has long been associated with the acquisition of memory related to aversive stimuli [11,13,25,31,34] and the modulation of memory processes involving the hippocampus [14,27,44].…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Adrenergic receptors found on vagal afferents project to the nucleus of the solitary tract and can subsequently activate neurons that project to the amygdala [11]. The amygdala has long been associated with the acquisition of memory related to aversive stimuli [11,13,25,31,34] and the modulation of memory processes involving the hippocampus [14,27,44]. Consequently, it is possible that in addition to enhancing the activity of non-cholinergic inputs to the hippocampus, administration of a mild aversive stimulus also activates parallel memory systems [29,47] that enhance performance, perhaps by strengthening the use of strategies less dependent on hippocampal cholinergic inputs.…”
Section: Potential Mechanisms and Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The efferent projections of different midline and intralaminar thalamic nuclei are to regionally distinct regions in the forebrain Groenewegen, 1990, 1991;Krout et al, 2002;Moga et al, 1995;Su and Bentivoglio, 1990), and relatively few of the neurons in these nuclei collateralizing to innervate multiple targets Calderazzo et al, 1996). Among the projection targets of the midline/intralaminar nuclei are distinct territories in the striatal complex, prefrontal cortex, amygdala, and hippocampus ( Berendse and Groenewegen, 1990; Bubser and Deutch, 1998;Calderazzo et al, 1996;Jayaraman, 1985). These areas also all receive DA inputs from the midbrain (Deutch et al, 1988, Moore andBloom, 1978;Swanson, 1982).…”
Section: Functional Implicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%