2019
DOI: 10.1109/access.2018.2886569
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branch Point Selection in RNA Splicing Using Deep Learning

Abstract: Alternative splicing (AS) is a regulated process that takes place during gene expression by which a single gene may code for multiple proteins. This mechanism is controlled by a complex called spliceosome by which certain exons of a gene may be included in or excluded out from the final mRNA produced from that gene. In AS, at least three remarkable signals exist in introns and they are 5' splice site (5'ss), the donor ss where GU nucleotides are more frequently present, 3'ss, the acceptor ss where AG nucleotid… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
41
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(44 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(37 reference statements)
3
41
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The deep learning tools, LaBranchoR and RNABS showed the maximum number of common predicted BPs from Ensembl (28.63%) and from RNA-seq (33.57%) data. Indeed, these two tools are both based on the same deep learning approach (bidirectional long short-term memory) and used the same sequence length (70 nt) as input [20,21]. By comparison, RNABPS employed a dilated convolution model explaining and showed an improvement of prediction compared to LaB-ranchoR (73.06% against 64.77% of accuracy) using the Ensembl data (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The deep learning tools, LaBranchoR and RNABS showed the maximum number of common predicted BPs from Ensembl (28.63%) and from RNA-seq (33.57%) data. Indeed, these two tools are both based on the same deep learning approach (bidirectional long short-term memory) and used the same sequence length (70 nt) as input [20,21]. By comparison, RNABPS employed a dilated convolution model explaining and showed an improvement of prediction compared to LaB-ranchoR (73.06% against 64.77% of accuracy) using the Ensembl data (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This collection of BPs was extended by two further studies: the first used 1.31 trillion reads from 17,164 RNA-seq data sets [16], and the second identified BPs by the spliceosome iCLIP method [17]. Thus, several bioinformatics tools for BP prediction have recently emerged: Branch Point Prediction (BPP) [18], Branchpointer [19], LaBranchoR [20] and RNA Branch Point Selection (RNABPS) [21] (Table 1). Briefly, HSF uses a position weighted matrix approach with a 7mer motif as a reference (5 nt upstream and 1 nt downstream of the branch point A) ( Fig.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The deep learning tools, LaBranchoR and RNABS showed the maximum number of common predicted BPs from Ensembl (28.63 %) and from RNA-seq (33.57 %) data. Indeed, these two tools are both based on the same deep learning approach (bidirectional long short-term memory) and used the same sequence length (70 nt) as input [20,21]. By comparison, RNABPS employed a dilated convolution model explaining and showed an improvement of prediction compared to LaBranchoR (73.06 % against 64.77% of accuracy) using the Ensembl data (Table 3).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Earlier studies on BP prediction were largely based on classical machine learning with handcrafted sequential features [8]- [11], or deep neural networks [3], [12], [27], [28]. The former included features such as sequence conservation and positional bias for a support vector machine [8], motifs of an intron sequence for an ensemble of multiple algorithms [9], and a score function calculated from position-specific scoring matrix (PSSM) and binding energy of spliceosome [10].…”
Section: Machine Learning Approaches For Bp Predictionmentioning
confidence: 99%