2012
DOI: 10.1007/s00468-012-0715-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branch cuvettes as means of ozone risk assessment in adult forest tree crowns: combining experimental and modelling capacities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2012
2012
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 65 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Although in our field experiments at the treeline evergreen and deciduous conifers were exposed to different O 3 regimes, only mean O 3 concentrations above 120 nl l −1 induced statistically significant reductions in A max (Havranek et al, 1989;Volger, 1995) when compared to O 3 free controls in charcoal-filtered air. The basic assumption underlying the use of branch cuvettes for examining O 3 effects in entire crowns of mature trees has been justified by the principle of carbon autonomy regarding the overall carbon relations of individual branches, with respect to carbon gain, growth, and defense metabolism Matyssek et al, 2007;Wieser et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Although in our field experiments at the treeline evergreen and deciduous conifers were exposed to different O 3 regimes, only mean O 3 concentrations above 120 nl l −1 induced statistically significant reductions in A max (Havranek et al, 1989;Volger, 1995) when compared to O 3 free controls in charcoal-filtered air. The basic assumption underlying the use of branch cuvettes for examining O 3 effects in entire crowns of mature trees has been justified by the principle of carbon autonomy regarding the overall carbon relations of individual branches, with respect to carbon gain, growth, and defense metabolism Matyssek et al, 2007;Wieser et al, 2012).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…CO 2 concentration inside the chambers was checked with a Li 6200 (Li-Cor, Lincoln, USA) gas analyser and adjusted by hand to 350 ± 30 mol mol −1 during daylight hours and was somewhat above ambient CO 2 during the night due to twig respiration . Comparative measurements of gas exchange and biochemical parameters did not reveal significant differences in photosynthetic capacity and antioxidant contents between twigs outside cuvettes and twigs exposed to the ambient O 3 regime inside cuvettes (Havranek and Wieser, 1994;Wieser et al, , 2012.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Chamber methods are employed to isolate ozone uptake to foliage, soil, water, and other surfaces in the field (Almand-Hunter et al, 2015;Altimir et al, 2002;Fumagalli et al, 2016;Gut et al, 2002;Horváth et al, 2006;Kaplan et al, 1988;Kirkman et al, 2002;Meixner et al, 1997;Pilegaard, 2001;Remde et al, 1993;Tong et al, 2011;Unsworth et al, 1984;Wieser et al, 2012). However, previous work largely focuses on soil NO emissions (e.g., Gut et al, 2002;Horváth et al, 2006;Kaplan et al, 1988;Kirkman et al, 2002;Meixner et al, 1997;Remde et al, 1993) or plant responses to ozone (e.g., Tong et al, 2011;Wieser et al, 2012) rather than ozone deposition processes.…”
Section: Chamber Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Ozone was monitored continuously inside the cuvette using a UV-absorption-based method (Horiba, model APOA-350E). The opening and closing dynamic branch cuvette system allowed an estimate of total ozone loss rates (Altimir et al, 2002;Wieser et al, 2012). Following closure, ambient concentrations decreased due to loss processes inside the system.…”
Section: Total O 3 Loss Ratesmentioning
confidence: 99%