2014
DOI: 10.1007/s10845-014-0906-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branch-and-bound and PSO algorithms for no-wait job shop scheduling

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This problem has been widely studied in the literature using various optimization approaches based on greedy algorithms such as particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms, . However, in the context of resource sharing environments, these general approaches are ill‐equipped to address the variability of resource consumption and interference of jobs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This problem has been widely studied in the literature using various optimization approaches based on greedy algorithms such as particle swarm optimization and genetic algorithms, . However, in the context of resource sharing environments, these general approaches are ill‐equipped to address the variability of resource consumption and interference of jobs.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Wang and Li [12] proposed an accelerated tabu search (TS) to minimize the maximum lateness. AitZai et al [27] investigated a branchand-bound algorithm and a particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm. Pan and Wang [14] proposed an improved iterated greedy algorithm (IIGA) for F m |prmu, no−wait|C max .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From past to present, a large number of techniques have been proposed for solving the JSSP, which can be classified into two categories: a mathematical approach and an approximation approach. Historically, the use of mathematic methods, such as integer programming [1] or branch and bound algorithm [2,3], for solving the JSSP were popular because they could achieve an optimal solution. However, the mathematics optimization methods have limitations on the large-scale problems due to polynomialtime solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%