2011
DOI: 10.1007/s13173-011-0050-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Branch and bound algorithms for the maximum clique problem under a unified framework

Abstract: In this paper we review branch and bound-based algorithms proposed for the exact solution of the maximum clique problem and describe them under a unifying conceptual framework. As a proof of concept, we actually implemented eight of these algorithms as parametrized versions of one single general branch and bound algorithm. The purpose of the present work is double folded. In the one hand, the implementation of several different algorithms under the same computational environment allows for a more pre… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…From these results, one finds that the most effective algorithms are those that use vertex coloring for both bounding and branching like MCQ (Tomita & Seki, 2003), MCR (Tomita & Kameda, 2007), MCS (Tomita, Sutani, Higashi, Takahashi, & Wakatsuki, 2010), MaxCliqueDyn (Konc & Janežič, 2007) and BB-MaxClique (Segundo, Rodríguez-Losada, & Jiménez, 2011), and the MaxSAT based algorithms like MaxCLQ (Li & Quan, 2010). In Carmo & Züge (2012); Li & Quan (2010) and Tomita & Seki (2003), extensive comparisons are presented between the coloring based algorithm MCQ and some other algorithms before MCQ, like Cliquer (Östergård, 2002) and χ + DF (Fahle, 2002), disclosing that MCQ is superior on a wide range of DIMACS instances. Table 3: Performance comparison of 10 stat-of-art exact MCP algorithms on 35 popular DIMACS instances.…”
Section: Indicative Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From these results, one finds that the most effective algorithms are those that use vertex coloring for both bounding and branching like MCQ (Tomita & Seki, 2003), MCR (Tomita & Kameda, 2007), MCS (Tomita, Sutani, Higashi, Takahashi, & Wakatsuki, 2010), MaxCliqueDyn (Konc & Janežič, 2007) and BB-MaxClique (Segundo, Rodríguez-Losada, & Jiménez, 2011), and the MaxSAT based algorithms like MaxCLQ (Li & Quan, 2010). In Carmo & Züge (2012); Li & Quan (2010) and Tomita & Seki (2003), extensive comparisons are presented between the coloring based algorithm MCQ and some other algorithms before MCQ, like Cliquer (Östergård, 2002) and χ + DF (Fahle, 2002), disclosing that MCQ is superior on a wide range of DIMACS instances. Table 3: Performance comparison of 10 stat-of-art exact MCP algorithms on 35 popular DIMACS instances.…”
Section: Indicative Performance Evaluationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…it is a subset S of vertices with every two vertices in S forming an edge in G. A maximum clique is a clique that includes the largest possible number of vertices. The maximum clique problem [24] is NP-complete. The time complexity of the maximum clique detection [24] is known as O(2 n ) with n as the number of vertices in the graph.…”
Section: Graph Formalismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The maximum clique problem [24] is NP-complete. The time complexity of the maximum clique detection [24] is known as O(2 n ) with n as the number of vertices in the graph. Fortunately, maximum clique testing algorithms [24,25] have been developed, making the maximum clique detection problem affordable in practice.…”
Section: Graph Formalismsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations