Trends in Mathematics
DOI: 10.1007/978-3-7643-7400-6_4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brambles, Prisms and Grids

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
0
12
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…These propositions as stated thereafter. Proposition 4 ([9, Lemma 1], see also [1]). Let k and r be two positive integers.…”
Section: Definitions and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These propositions as stated thereafter. Proposition 4 ([9, Lemma 1], see also [1]). Let k and r be two positive integers.…”
Section: Definitions and Preliminariesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From Lemmas 2.1 and 2.3, G does not contain F 2n 2 −2n as a minor; otherwise we are done. A graph with no K 2 × C k minor, where C k is a cycle on k vertices, has treewidth at most 60k 2 − 120k + 63 [1]. As F k is a minor of K 2 × C k , the same bound holds for graphs with no F k minor.…”
Section: The Adhesion If a Tree Decomposition ({Xmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Notice that none of the above classes is minor comparable with the classes Pk and Fk treated in and . Moreover, scriptHk1scriptHk2scriptHk3, while Hk0 is not minor comparable with the other three.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 92%