2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.obhdp.2003.09.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brainstorming and task performance in groups constrained by evidence

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
29
2

Year Published

2005
2005
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 50 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
2
29
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Hence, our findings have contradicted an abundance of previous research [e.g. 16,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] showing real groups to be inferior to nominal groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Hence, our findings have contradicted an abundance of previous research [e.g. 16,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] showing real groups to be inferior to nominal groups.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, although we have shown that there is no statistically significant difference between the fluency of creativity when considering the effects of operational mechanisms in terms of individuals and groups, we have shown a significant change in the perform of real groups compared to previous research [e.g. 16,[25][26][27][28][29][30][31] and also shown real groups to be more effective during the design process compared to the nominal group compositions, when social influences upon creativity are controlled. Hence, our findings have contradicted an abundance of previous research [e.g.…”
Section: Discussioncontrasting
confidence: 74%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Divergent thinking, or the ability to generate a variety of differing ideas, opinions, or arguments, is an integral part of the creative problem-solving process for individuals and teams (Janis, 1982;Williams, 2004). Moreover, the link between divergent thinking and creativity has been demonstrated in a variety of contexts (Eisenberger, Armeli, & Pretz, 1998;McCrae, 1987;McGlynn, McGurck, Effland, Johll, & Harding, 2004). A reasonable inference from prior research is that organizations with norms for divergent thinking are more likely to inspire creativity in employees and in turn develop fruitful ways to transform crisis into opportunity than those organizations that emphasize more uniform perspectives and approaches to decision making.…”
Section: Establish Norms For Divergent Thinkingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the creativity literature novelty is a core part of the process of creativity whereby individuals (e.g. Amabile, 1996) and groups (e.g., McGlynn, McGurk, Sprague Effland, Johll & Harding, 2004) endeavour to generate new ideas and options in pursuit of eventual solutions. As part of an outcome, novelty has been even more widely examined as a vital aspect of ideas, processes or products (e.g., Shalley, Zhou & Oldham, 2004).…”
Section: Novelty and Demand For Noveltymentioning
confidence: 99%