1993
DOI: 10.1016/0165-5876(93)90014-t
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brainstem auditory evoked potentials in young children before and after tympanostomy tube placement

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1994
1994
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Fria and Sabo (1980) measured latency components of the ABR at the time of myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion and showed that this technique was promising as a predictor of the presence or absence of otitis media with effusion. Similar measurements were carried out by Owen et al (1993). Both these studies employed the wave V latency input/output function to predict the threshold rather than using the actual response threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Fria and Sabo (1980) measured latency components of the ABR at the time of myringotomy and tympanostomy tube insertion and showed that this technique was promising as a predictor of the presence or absence of otitis media with effusion. Similar measurements were carried out by Owen et al (1993). Both these studies employed the wave V latency input/output function to predict the threshold rather than using the actual response threshold.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…To illustrate the effects of OMmediated conductive hearing loss on spatial hearing, we can make approximations of azimuthal shifts relative to midline by using the abnormal interaural time and level differences resultant from OM. Peak latencies for the click-evoked auditory brainstem response have been shown to be delayed by 0.44 ms on average and thresholds increased by approximately 20 dB in young children with middle ear effusion compared with audiometrically normal controls (Owen et al 1993). Though ostensibly small, introducing a 0.44 ms interaural time difference (ITD), in cases of unilateral or asymmetrical OM, translates to a 45°shift in azimuthal position relative to midline based on the expected skull radius of a 6-12 months old infant (7.16 cm based on average growth charts of head circumference, Center for Disease Control 2000) using the following formula:…”
Section: An Introduction To Otitis Media and Amblyaudiamentioning
confidence: 98%
“…While the ABR testing is a powerful tool for the detection and quantification of hearing loss in the pediatric population, it remains controversial among professionals when it is used in the OR, especially after myringotomy and tube placement. Early studies reported improved hearing immediately after tube placement by ABR testing and justified the use of ABR testing in the OR [10,11]. Clinical studies in recent years have revealed significant discrepancies between ABR results obtained in the OR and those obtained in the follow-up period, raising a concern regarding the validity of ABR outcomes obtained in the OR [7][8][9].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%