2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.01.032
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

BrainPrint: A discriminative characterization of brain morphology

Abstract: We introduce BrainPrint, a compact and discriminative representation of brain morphology. BrainPrint captures shape information of an ensemble of cortical and subcortical structures by solving the eigenvalue problem of the 2D and 3D Laplace-Beltrami operator on triangular (boundary) and tetrahedral (volumetric) meshes. This discriminative characterization enables new ways to study the similarity between brains; the focus can either be on a specific brain structure of interest or on the overall brain similarity… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
196
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 151 publications
(206 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
10
196
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Currently, there are multiple methods of deriving a brain age estimate which are applicable for identifying differential rates of aging (Bunge and Whitaker, 2012; Franke et al, 2010; Wachinger et al, 2015), tracking recovery from traumatic brain injuries (Cole et al, 2015) and in measuring brain development in patients with multiple sclerosis (Aubert-Broche et al, 2014). When predicting chronological age, other methods have explained more variance in their data then in the methods employed in this work (Cole et al, 2015; Franke et al, 2010; Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Currently, there are multiple methods of deriving a brain age estimate which are applicable for identifying differential rates of aging (Bunge and Whitaker, 2012; Franke et al, 2010; Wachinger et al, 2015), tracking recovery from traumatic brain injuries (Cole et al, 2015) and in measuring brain development in patients with multiple sclerosis (Aubert-Broche et al, 2014). When predicting chronological age, other methods have explained more variance in their data then in the methods employed in this work (Cole et al, 2015; Franke et al, 2010; Wang et al, 2014).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Based on these meshes, we compute compact shape representations for all structures, constituting the BrainPrint (Wachinger et al, 2015). The shapeDNA (Reuter et al, 2006) is used as shape descriptor, which performed among the best in a comparison of methods for non-rigid 3D shape retrieval (Lian et al, 2012).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The extensive list of articles discussed in the review illustrates the wide interest in the research field. In this work, we introduce an algorithm for AD classification that is based on BrainPrint (Wachinger et al, 2015) for quantifying brain morphology, which naturally extends the region of interest (ROI)-based volume and thickness analysis with shape information (Reuter et al, 2006). Anatomical shape features contribute valuable information to the characterization of brain structures, which are only coarsely represented by their volume.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the computational analysis of brain anatomy, volumetric or surface feature measures of structures identified on 3D MRI have been used to study group differences in brain structure and also to predict diagnosis (Botino et al, 2002; Li et al, 2014). In research studies that analyze brain morphometry, many shape analysis methods have been proposed, such as spherical harmonic analysis (SPHARM) (Gerig et al, 2001; Chung et al, 2008), medial representations (M-reps) (Pizer et al, 1999), point distribution models (PDM) (Cootes et al, 1995; Shen et al, 2004), minimum description length approaches (Davies et al, 2003), spectral methods (Shi et al, 2010; Seo and Chung, 2011; Wachinger et al, 2015) and cortical thickness and gyrification indices (Batchelor et al, 2002; Luders et al, 2006), etc. These methods may be applied to analyze shape changes or abnormalities in brain cortical and subcortical structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%