Abstract:Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is a high-quality medical image that is used to detect brain tumours in a complex and time-consuming manner. In this study, a back propagation neural network (BPNN) along with the Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (LMA) is proposed to classify MRIs and diagnose brain tumours in a simple and fast process. The BPNN has 10 neurons in the hidden layer, and the default function of the feedforward feeds is mean squared error (MSE). The LMA is optimized as a multivariable adaptive approac… Show more
“…A longer box means more scattered data and a smaller box means less scattered data. In Figure 5, the GA‐ANFIS shows a smaller boxplot and less scattered data [26], which denotes a better performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the morphological operation, the feature vectors are extracted and feature selection is performed for categorizing and recognition. The features of mean, standard deviation, entropy, energy, contrast, homogeneity, correlation, root mean square (RMS), variance, covariance, skewness, and kurtosis are extracted by the GLCM [26]. By feature selection, only appropriate and informative features are chosen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two scenarios of classical image processing (CIP) and binary image with variable fuzzy level (BIVFL) were applied to diagnose brain tumours [25], that are not fully automated. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (LMA) assisted a backpropagation neural network (BPNN) to classify MRIs and diagnose brain tumours [26], this technique is fast but the tumour types are not classified. The tumours were detected and classified into benign (low grade) or malignant (high grade) by a type-II fuzzy inference system (FIS) and ANFIS [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and multilevel linear clustering algorithm ANFIS + MLCA [2] Multilayer perceptron MLP [3] K-nearest neighbour and fuzzy c-mean KNN + FCM [8] Neural gas network NGN [11] Non-subsampled contourlet transform NSCT [14] Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II NSGA-II [16][17][18][19][20] Grey-level difference method GLDM [19] Gliomas using radiomics, GA features and extremely randomized trees GRGE [21] Artificial bee colony algorithm ABC [24] Principal component analysis PCA [24] Template-based k-means TK [25] Classical image processing CIP [25] Binary image with variable fuzzy level BIVFL [26] Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm LMA [26] Backpropagation neural network BPNN [27] Fuzzy inference system FIS […”
An adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system is presented which is optimized by a genetic algorithm to classify normal and abnormal brain tumours. The classifier is fast and simple, named genetic algorithm‐adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system, and the determined learning rules minimize its error and improve its accuracy. The presented system follows five steps including preprocessing, morphological operation, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification. Morphological operators segment the abnormal regions and calculate the tumour area. The statistical features and the grey‐level co‐occurrence matrix are employed for feature extraction. Magnetic resonance images are considered and 12 statistical features are extracted, then the genetic algorithm‐based selection technique helps to select features and reduce the extracted features and improves the accuracy and decision time. So, the high dimensionality and the computational complexity of the adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system are reduced, and the classifier decides more efficiently. The input data are the figshare brain tumour dataset with 670 abnormal and 670 normal magnetic resonance images, and the classifier requires 10.788 s for classification. The efficient performance of the genetic algorithm‐adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system is confirmed by the accuracy of 99.85%, sensitivity of 99.7%, specificity of 100%, precision of 100%, and mean square error of 0.0027.
“…A longer box means more scattered data and a smaller box means less scattered data. In Figure 5, the GA‐ANFIS shows a smaller boxplot and less scattered data [26], which denotes a better performance.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After the morphological operation, the feature vectors are extracted and feature selection is performed for categorizing and recognition. The features of mean, standard deviation, entropy, energy, contrast, homogeneity, correlation, root mean square (RMS), variance, covariance, skewness, and kurtosis are extracted by the GLCM [26]. By feature selection, only appropriate and informative features are chosen.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Two scenarios of classical image processing (CIP) and binary image with variable fuzzy level (BIVFL) were applied to diagnose brain tumours [25], that are not fully automated. The Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm (LMA) assisted a backpropagation neural network (BPNN) to classify MRIs and diagnose brain tumours [26], this technique is fast but the tumour types are not classified. The tumours were detected and classified into benign (low grade) or malignant (high grade) by a type-II fuzzy inference system (FIS) and ANFIS [27].…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[1] Adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and multilevel linear clustering algorithm ANFIS + MLCA [2] Multilayer perceptron MLP [3] K-nearest neighbour and fuzzy c-mean KNN + FCM [8] Neural gas network NGN [11] Non-subsampled contourlet transform NSCT [14] Non-dominated sorting genetic algorithm-II NSGA-II [16][17][18][19][20] Grey-level difference method GLDM [19] Gliomas using radiomics, GA features and extremely randomized trees GRGE [21] Artificial bee colony algorithm ABC [24] Principal component analysis PCA [24] Template-based k-means TK [25] Classical image processing CIP [25] Binary image with variable fuzzy level BIVFL [26] Levenberg-Marquardt algorithm LMA [26] Backpropagation neural network BPNN [27] Fuzzy inference system FIS […”
An adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system is presented which is optimized by a genetic algorithm to classify normal and abnormal brain tumours. The classifier is fast and simple, named genetic algorithm‐adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system, and the determined learning rules minimize its error and improve its accuracy. The presented system follows five steps including preprocessing, morphological operation, feature extraction, feature selection, and classification. Morphological operators segment the abnormal regions and calculate the tumour area. The statistical features and the grey‐level co‐occurrence matrix are employed for feature extraction. Magnetic resonance images are considered and 12 statistical features are extracted, then the genetic algorithm‐based selection technique helps to select features and reduce the extracted features and improves the accuracy and decision time. So, the high dimensionality and the computational complexity of the adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system are reduced, and the classifier decides more efficiently. The input data are the figshare brain tumour dataset with 670 abnormal and 670 normal magnetic resonance images, and the classifier requires 10.788 s for classification. The efficient performance of the genetic algorithm‐adaptive neuro‐fuzzy inference system is confirmed by the accuracy of 99.85%, sensitivity of 99.7%, specificity of 100%, precision of 100%, and mean square error of 0.0027.
“…Therefore, the development of an automatic or semi-automatic computeraided diagnostic (CAD) system in real medical therapies is needed to reduce the workload of physicians and improve accuracy. CAD system for brain tumours consists of tumour detection [4][5][6], segmentation [7][8][9], and classification [10][11][12][13] processes from MR images.…”
The automatic segmentation of brain tumours is a critical task in patient disease management. It can help specialists easily identify the location, size, and type of tumour to make the best decisions regarding the patients' treatment process. Recently, deep learning methods with attention mechanism helped increase the performance of segmentation models. The proposed method consists of two main parts: the first part leverages a deep neural network architecture for biggest tumour detection (BTD) and in the second part, ResNet152V2 makes it possible to segment the image with the attention block and the extraction of local and global features. The custom attention block is used to consider the most important parts in the slices, emphasizing on related information for segmentation. The results show that the proposed method achieves average Dice scores of 0.81, 0.87 and 0.91 for enhancing core, tumour core and whole tumour on BraTS2020 dataset, respectively. Compared with other segmentation approaches, this method achieves better performance on tumour core and whole tumour. Further comparisons on BraTS2018 and BraTS2017 validation datasets show that this method outperforms other models based on Dice score and Hausdorff criterion.
SummaryAn analog background calibration approach is presented for the full calibration of pipeline analog‐to‐digital converters (ADCs). A well‐trained neural network acts close to the ideal 1.5‐bit stage, and its residue is compared with the real 1.5‐bit stage including gain error and amplifier nonlinearities. The detected error is used to compensate for the imperfect residue using four calibration polynomial coefficients. The corrected residue enters the second stage of the pipeline ADC and follows a normal path to achieve high resolution. The introduced structure is verified in a 12‐bit pipelined ADC composed of 11 stages; the first 10 stages have a 1.5‐bit structure, while the last stage is a 2‐bit flash. The sampling frequency is 100 MHz, and 10% non‐ideal factors (5% for each of the nonlinear and gain errors and 10% for the aggregated error) are considered for the first stage, while the input is 19.5 MHz sinusoidal waveform. A random noise is applied to the input to limit the effective number of bits (ENOB) to almost 11.8. The evaluation parameters of the ADC are extracted, signal‐to‐noise and distortion ratio increases from 39.14 to 72.91 dB, spurious free dynamic range improves from 40.94 to 79.69 dB, and the ENOB enhances from 6.2 to 11.82. The presented mechanism shows an acceptable accuracy in the high‐speed and high‐resolution ADCs.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.