2018
DOI: 10.1007/978-981-10-7386-1_30
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Brain Tumor Segmentation Using K-means–FCM Hybrid Technique

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

1
1
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
1
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In similar studies, authors obtained a HR of 86% and MR of 0.79, which was considered satisfactory. (24)(25)(26) In this study, the HR was 89.23% and the MR was 0.70, i.e., quantitatively similar to those of previous authors, which indicates good accuracy of the proposed segmentation method. The best HR results were obtained for T2 and FSPGR-T1c sequences.…”
Section: Comparative Performance Analysis Of Automatic Segmentationsupporting
confidence: 89%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In similar studies, authors obtained a HR of 86% and MR of 0.79, which was considered satisfactory. (24)(25)(26) In this study, the HR was 89.23% and the MR was 0.70, i.e., quantitatively similar to those of previous authors, which indicates good accuracy of the proposed segmentation method. The best HR results were obtained for T2 and FSPGR-T1c sequences.…”
Section: Comparative Performance Analysis Of Automatic Segmentationsupporting
confidence: 89%
“…Quantitative results of the automatic segmentation were calculated by comparison between the gold standard and the proposed segmentation method. The metrics commonly used in the literature (24)(25)(26) to assess performance are the hit rate (HR), calculated by the number of true positive (TP) of the method compared with the gold standard; and the matching rate (MR), based on the number of false positive results (FP). In the cited studies, the HR and MR are respectively defined as:…”
Section: Evaluation Of Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%